Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs o3 Mini High

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL leads o3 Mini High on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 26.5 to 11.0, and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs 8.8x less per output token ($0.50 vs $4.40 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 1 benchmarks have a result for both.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VLNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
35.6
Output $/M
$0.50
1
o3 Mini HighOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.40
0
vs boards won of 1 shared

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or o3 Mini High: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for output tokens 8.8x cheaper ($0.50 vs $4.40 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 200K tokens).

Shared results
1
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL only
15
o3 Mini High only
2
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL not benchmarked, o3 Mini High not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 15.5 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 26.5 against o3 Mini High 11.0, 15.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL $0.50 against o3 Mini High $4.40 per million output tokens, 8.8x apart.
Context window
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL takes 1.05M tokens, o3 Mini High 200K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNemotron 3.5 Super VLBarso3 Mini HighTies
Intelligence10
All shared boards10
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index3 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and o3 Mini High
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLo3 Mini HighLeader
LiveBench coding65.5%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured16.3Only o3 Mini High measured
SciCode47.8%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and o3 Mini High
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLo3 Mini HighLeader
AA Intelligence Index26.511.0Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and o3 Mini High
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLo3 Mini HighLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured0.9Only o3 Mini High measured
LiveBench research70.9%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench browser4.0%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench long agentic15.8%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and o3 Mini High
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLo3 Mini HighLeader
LiveBench reasoning78.8%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)30.7%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
MathNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and o3 Mini High
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLo3 Mini HighLeader
Neither model has a result on 13 boards here
KnowledgeNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and o3 Mini High
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLo3 Mini HighLeader
Neither model has a result on 18 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and o3 Mini High
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLo3 Mini HighLeader
Design Arena: websites1173Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: UI components1149Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: game dev1110Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: 3D1127Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: all code categories1155Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench design60.7%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and o3 Mini High
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLo3 Mini HighLeader
LiveBench data analysis64.6%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)69.0%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Neither model has a result on the other 44 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and o3 Mini High
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLo3 Mini HighLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0004Fits in one request
o3 Mini High$0.0033Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0090Fits in one request
o3 Mini High$0.068Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.035Fits in one request
o3 Mini High$0.264Exceeds the context window

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and o3 Mini High
SpecificationNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super VLOpenAI o3 Mini High
MakerNVIDIAOpenAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 15, 2026February 12, 2025
Context window1.05M200K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$1.10
Output $/Mtok$0.50$4.40
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nemotron 3.5 Super VL better than o3 Mini High for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for output tokens 8.8x cheaper ($0.50 vs $4.40 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 200K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or o3 Mini High?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; o3 Mini High costs $1.10 and $4.40. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or o3 Mini High?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs o3 Mini High comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and o3 Mini High's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next