Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Nemotron 3 Super

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL leads Nemotron 3 Super on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 26.5 to 12.8, at about the same output price ($0.50 vs $0.45 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 4 benchmarks have a result for both.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VLNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
35.6
Output $/M
$0.50
4
Nemotron 3 SuperNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.45
0
vs boards won of 4 shared

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or Nemotron 3 Super: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens).

Shared results
4
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL only
12
Nemotron 3 Super only
35
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL not benchmarked, Nemotron 3 Super not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 13.7 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 26.5 against Nemotron 3 Super 12.8, 13.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL $0.50 against Nemotron 3 Super $0.45 per million output tokens, 1.1x apart.
Context window
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL takes 1.05M tokens, Nemotron 3 Super 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNemotron 3.5 Super VLBarsNemotron 3 SuperTies
Coding10
Intelligence10
Reasoning10
General10
All shared boards40
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLNemotron 3 SuperLeader
LiveBench coding65.5%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured37.7Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
SciCode47.8%36.2%Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured28.8%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
WeirdMLNot measured38.0%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
ALE-BenchNot measured213.9Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1404Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1409Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLNemotron 3 SuperLeader
AA Intelligence Index26.512.8Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLNemotron 3 SuperLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.7Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LiveBench research70.9%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench browser4.0%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench long agentic15.8%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured67.8%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLNemotron 3 SuperLeader
LiveBench reasoning78.8%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured80.0%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)30.7%20.8%Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1386Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1398Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1397Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLNemotron 3 SuperLeader
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1380Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1405Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
MathArenaNot measured16.6%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLNemotron 3 SuperLeader
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1388Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1383Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1392Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1364Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLNemotron 3 SuperLeader
Design Arena: websites1172Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: UI components1148Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: game dev1110Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: 3D1127Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: all code categories1154Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench design60.7%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLNemotron 3 SuperLeader
LiveBench data analysis64.6%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
IFBenchNot measured71.5%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)69.0%65.7%Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
LMArena TextNot measured1378Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1347Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1317Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1400Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1356Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1432Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1341Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1403Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1418Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1336Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1346Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1369Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1362Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1331Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1336Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLNemotron 3 SuperLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0004Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Super$0.0003Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0090Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Super$0.0056Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.035Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Super$0.021Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Nemotron 3 Super
SpecificationNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super VLNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super
MakerNVIDIANVIDIA
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 15, 2026March 11, 2026
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.085
Output $/Mtok$0.50$0.45
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nemotron 3.5 Super VL better than Nemotron 3 Super for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or Nemotron 3 Super?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Super costs $0.085 and $0.45. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or Nemotron 3 Super?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Nemotron 3 Super comparison based on?

4 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Nemotron 3 Super's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next