Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety costs 5.0x less per output token than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking ($0.20 vs $1.00 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Replace Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety Replace Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Nemotron 3.5 Content SafetyNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.00
vs $0.20 vs $1.00 per 1M output tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 5.0x cheaper.

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety for output tokens 5.0x cheaper ($0.20 vs $1.00 per million).

Model ANemotron 3.5 Content SafetyNVIDIANot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BQwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingQwenNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task

No benchmark has tested both yet. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety has none yet; Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking on AA Intelligence Index. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety not benchmarked, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety $0.20 against Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking $1.00 per million output tokens, 5.0x apart.
Context window
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety takes 131K tokens, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Content SafetyQwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured9.5Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety$0.0003Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking$0.0008Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety$0.011Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking$0.018Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety$0.042Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking$0.068Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
SpecificationNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Content SafetyQwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
MakerNVIDIAQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJune 4, 2026October 6, 2025
Context window131K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.20$0.29
Output $/Mtok$0.20$1.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety better than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety for output tokens 5.0x cheaper ($0.20 vs $1.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking costs $0.29 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking, with 262K tokens against 131K.

Has any benchmark tested both Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety has none yet; Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking on AA Intelligence Index. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 23, 2026.

Compare next