Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Hermes 4 405B vs Qwen3 Coder Flash

Updated October 21, 2026. No benchmark has tested both models yet. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

N Hermes 4 405BNous Research
Coding
No data
Overall
7.5
Output $/M
$3.00
Qwen3 Coder FlashQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.975
vs $3.00 vs $0.975 per 1M output tokens. Qwen3 Coder Flash is 3.1x cheaper.

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. Hermes 4 405B has results on AA Intelligence Index; Qwen3 Coder Flash has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Hermes 4 405B not benchmarked, Qwen3 Coder Flash not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Hermes 4 405B $3.00 against Qwen3 Coder Flash $0.975 per million output tokens, 3.1x apart.
Context window
Hermes 4 405B takes 131K tokens, Qwen3 Coder Flash 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Hermes 4 405B and Qwen3 Coder Flash
BenchmarkHermes 4 405BQwen3 Coder FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index7.5Not measuredOnly Hermes 4 405B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Hermes 4 405B$0.0025Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder Flash$0.0007Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Hermes 4 405B$0.059Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder Flash$0.013Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Hermes 4 405B$0.230Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 Coder Flash$0.049Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Hermes 4 405B and Qwen3 Coder Flash
SpecificationNous Hermes 4 405BQwen3 Coder Flash
MakerNous ResearchQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 26, 2025September 17, 2025
Context window131K1M
Input $/Mtok$1.00$0.195
Output $/Mtok$3.00$0.975
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Hermes 4 405B better than Qwen3 Coder Flash for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Hermes 4 405B or Qwen3 Coder Flash?

Hermes 4 405B costs $1.00 per million input tokens and $3.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder Flash costs $0.195 and $0.975. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Hermes 4 405B or Qwen3 Coder Flash?

Qwen3 Coder Flash, with 1M tokens against 131K.

Has any benchmark tested both Hermes 4 405B and Qwen3 Coder Flash?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Hermes 4 405B has results on AA Intelligence Index; Qwen3 Coder Flash has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next