Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Hermes 3 70B Instruct vs Step 3.7 Flash

Step 3.7 Flash leads Hermes 3 70B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 19.5 to 6.7, and Hermes 3 70B Instruct costs 1.6x less per output token ($0.70 vs $1.15 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 3 benchmarks have a result for both.

N Hermes 3 70B InstructNous Research
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.70
0
Step 3.7 FlashStepFun
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.15
3
vs boards won of 3 shared

Hermes 3 70B Instruct or Step 3.7 Flash: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Hermes 3 70B Instruct for output tokens 1.6x cheaper ($0.70 vs $1.15 per million) and work measured by AA Intelligence Index or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
3
Hermes 3 70B Instruct only
2
Step 3.7 Flash only
16
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Hermes 3 70B Instruct not benchmarked, Step 3.7 Flash not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 29.1 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run): Hermes 3 70B Instruct 40.1% against Step 3.7 Flash 80.9%, 40.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Hermes 3 70B Instruct $0.70 against Step 3.7 Flash $1.15 per million output tokens, 1.6x apart.
Context window
Hermes 3 70B Instruct takes 131K tokens, Step 3.7 Flash 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryHermes 3 70B InstructBarsStep 3.7 FlashTies
Intelligence01
Reasoning02
All shared boards03
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index5 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Hermes 3 70B Instruct and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkHermes 3 70B InstructStep 3.7 FlashLeader
AA Coding IndexNot measured39.6Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)18.8%Not measuredOnly Hermes 3 70B Instruct measured
SciCodeNot measured43.9%Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured35.6%Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
ALE-BenchNot measured694.1Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Hermes 3 70B Instruct and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkHermes 3 70B InstructStep 3.7 FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index6.719.5Step 3.7 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Hermes 3 70B Instruct and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkHermes 3 70B InstructStep 3.7 FlashLeader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured98.5%Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for Hermes 3 70B Instruct and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkHermes 3 70B InstructStep 3.7 FlashLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)40.1%80.9%Step 3.7 Flash
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.0%21.4%Step 3.7 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Math benchmarks for Hermes 3 70B Instruct and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkHermes 3 70B InstructStep 3.7 FlashLeader
MathArenaNot measured19.1%Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Hermes 3 70B Instruct and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkHermes 3 70B InstructStep 3.7 FlashLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)57.1%Not measuredOnly Hermes 3 70B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Hermes 3 70B Instruct and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkHermes 3 70B InstructStep 3.7 FlashLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1196Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1177Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1157Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1172Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1129Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1181Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1083Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1152Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Hermes 3 70B Instruct and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkHermes 3 70B InstructStep 3.7 FlashLeader
IFBenchNot measured67.3%Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured73.7%Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 46 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Hermes 3 70B Instruct and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkHermes 3 70B InstructStep 3.7 FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Hermes 3 70B Instruct$0.0010Fits in one request
Step 3.7 Flash$0.0008Fits in one request

Step 3.7 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Hermes 3 70B Instruct$0.037Fits in one request
Step 3.7 Flash$0.013Fits in one request

Step 3.7 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Hermes 3 70B Instruct$0.147Exceeds the context window
Step 3.7 Flash$0.051Fits in one request

Step 3.7 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Hermes 3 70B Instruct and Step 3.7 Flash
SpecificationNous Hermes 3 70B InstructStepFun Step 3.7 Flash
MakerNous ResearchStepFun
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 18, 2024May 28, 2026
Context window131K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.70$0.20
Output $/Mtok$0.70$1.15
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Hermes 3 70B Instruct better than Step 3.7 Flash for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Hermes 3 70B Instruct for output tokens 1.6x cheaper ($0.70 vs $1.15 per million) and work measured by AA Intelligence Index or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Hermes 3 70B Instruct or Step 3.7 Flash?

Hermes 3 70B Instruct costs $0.70 per million input tokens and $0.70 per million output tokens; Step 3.7 Flash costs $0.20 and $1.15. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Hermes 3 70B Instruct or Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Hermes 3 70B Instruct vs Step 3.7 Flash comparison based on?

3 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Hermes 3 70B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Step 3.7 Flash's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next