Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Hermes 3 70B Instruct vs Nemotron 3 Super

Nemotron 3 Super leads Hermes 3 70B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 12.8 to 6.7, and Nemotron 3 Super costs 1.6x less per output token ($0.45 vs $0.70 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 3 benchmarks have a result for both.

N Hermes 3 70B InstructNous Research
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.70
0
Nemotron 3 SuperNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.45
3
vs boards won of 3 shared

Hermes 3 70B Instruct or Nemotron 3 Super: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Hermes 3 70B Instruct for work measured by AA Intelligence Index or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
3
Hermes 3 70B Instruct only
2
Nemotron 3 Super only
36
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Hermes 3 70B Instruct not benchmarked, Nemotron 3 Super not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 28.4 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run): Hermes 3 70B Instruct 40.1% against Nemotron 3 Super 80.0%, 39.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Hermes 3 70B Instruct $0.70 against Nemotron 3 Super $0.45 per million output tokens, 1.6x apart.
Context window
Hermes 3 70B Instruct takes 131K tokens, Nemotron 3 Super 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryHermes 3 70B InstructBarsNemotron 3 SuperTies
Intelligence01
Reasoning02
All shared boards03
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index8 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Hermes 3 70B Instruct and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkHermes 3 70B InstructNemotron 3 SuperLeader
AA Coding IndexNot measured37.7Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)18.8%Not measuredOnly Hermes 3 70B Instruct measured
SciCodeNot measured36.2%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured28.8%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
WeirdMLNot measured38.0%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
ALE-BenchNot measured213.9Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1404Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1409Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Hermes 3 70B Instruct and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkHermes 3 70B InstructNemotron 3 SuperLeader
AA Intelligence Index6.712.8Nemotron 3 Super
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Hermes 3 70B Instruct and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkHermes 3 70B InstructNemotron 3 SuperLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.7Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured67.8%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for Hermes 3 70B Instruct and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkHermes 3 70B InstructNemotron 3 SuperLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)40.1%80.0%Nemotron 3 Super
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.0%20.8%Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1386Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1398Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1397Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Hermes 3 70B Instruct and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkHermes 3 70B InstructNemotron 3 SuperLeader
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1380Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1405Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
MathArenaNot measured16.6%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Hermes 3 70B Instruct and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkHermes 3 70B InstructNemotron 3 SuperLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)57.1%Not measuredOnly Hermes 3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1388Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1383Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1392Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1364Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Hermes 3 70B Instruct and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkHermes 3 70B InstructNemotron 3 SuperLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Hermes 3 70B Instruct and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkHermes 3 70B InstructNemotron 3 SuperLeader
IFBenchNot measured71.5%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured65.7%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena TextNot measured1378Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1347Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1317Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1400Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1356Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1432Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1341Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1403Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1418Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1336Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1346Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1369Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1362Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1331Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1336Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Hermes 3 70B Instruct and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkHermes 3 70B InstructNemotron 3 SuperLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Hermes 3 70B Instruct$0.0010Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Super$0.0003Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Hermes 3 70B Instruct$0.037Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Super$0.0056Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Hermes 3 70B Instruct$0.147Exceeds the context window
Nemotron 3 Super$0.021Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Hermes 3 70B Instruct and Nemotron 3 Super
SpecificationNous Hermes 3 70B InstructNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super
MakerNous ResearchNVIDIA
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 18, 2024March 11, 2026
Context window131K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.70$0.085
Output $/Mtok$0.70$0.45
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Hermes 3 70B Instruct better than Nemotron 3 Super for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Hermes 3 70B Instruct for work measured by AA Intelligence Index or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Hermes 3 70B Instruct or Nemotron 3 Super?

Hermes 3 70B Instruct costs $0.70 per million input tokens and $0.70 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Super costs $0.085 and $0.45. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Hermes 3 70B Instruct or Nemotron 3 Super?

Nemotron 3 Super, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Hermes 3 70B Instruct vs Nemotron 3 Super comparison based on?

3 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. Hermes 3 70B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3 Super's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next