Hermes 3 70B Instruct vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety costs 3.5x less per output token than Hermes 3 70B Instruct ($0.20 vs $0.70 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $0.70
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $0.20
Hermes 3 70B Instruct or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Compare them on price, context and the boards below.
No benchmark has tested both yet. Hermes 3 70B Instruct has results on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), AA Intelligence Index and GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run); Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only Hermes 3 70B Instruct has a AA Intelligence Index result, 6.7.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
No call
Both take 131K tokens.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Hermes 3 70B Instruct $0.0010, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety $0.0003 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Hermes 3 70B Instruct not benchmarked, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
- Widest single gap
- None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
- Output price
- Hermes 3 70B Instruct $0.70 against Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety $0.20 per million output tokens, 3.5x apart.
- Context window
- Both take 131K tokens.
Benchmark by benchmark
Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index1 board measured
| Benchmark | Hermes 3 70B Instruct | Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 18.8% | Not measured | Only Hermes 3 70B Instruct measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 42 boards here | |||
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
| Benchmark | Hermes 3 70B Instruct | Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 6.7 | Not measured | Only Hermes 3 70B Instruct measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
| Benchmark | Hermes 3 70B Instruct | Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 40.1% | Not measured | Only Hermes 3 70B Instruct measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 4.0% | Not measured | Only Hermes 3 70B Instruct measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
| Benchmark | Hermes 3 70B Instruct | Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 57.1% | Not measured | Only Hermes 3 70B Instruct measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Nous Hermes 3 70B Instruct | NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Nous Research | NVIDIA |
| Weights | Open weights | Open weights |
| Released | August 18, 2024 | June 4, 2026 |
| Context window | 131K | 131K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.70 | $0.20 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.70 | $0.20 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Hermes 3 70B Instruct better than Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.
Which is cheaper, Hermes 3 70B Instruct or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?
Hermes 3 70B Instruct costs $0.70 per million input tokens and $0.70 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety costs $0.20 and $0.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Hermes 3 70B Instruct or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?
Neither: both take 131K tokens.
Has any benchmark tested both Hermes 3 70B Instruct and Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?
No benchmark has tested both yet. Hermes 3 70B Instruct has results on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), AA Intelligence Index and GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run); Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 23, 2026.