Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nex-N2.5-Mini vs Llama 3 8B Lunaris

Llama 3 8B Lunaris costs 2.0x less per output token than Nex-N2.5-Mini ($0.05 vs $0.10 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Replace Nex-N2.5-Mini Replace Llama 3 8B Lunaris
N Nex-N2.5-MiniNex AGI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.10
S Llama 3 8B LunarisSao10K
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.05
vs $0.10 vs $0.05 per 1M output tokens. Llama 3 8B Lunaris is 2.0x cheaper.

Nex-N2.5-Mini or Llama 3 8B Lunaris: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nex-N2.5-Mini for a larger context window (262K against 8K tokens).

Model ANex-N2.5-MiniNex AGINot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BLlama 3 8B LunarisSao10KNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nex-N2.5-Mini not benchmarked, Llama 3 8B Lunaris not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Nex-N2.5-Mini $0.10 against Llama 3 8B Lunaris $0.05 per million output tokens, 2.0x apart.
Context window
Nex-N2.5-Mini takes 262K tokens, Llama 3 8B Lunaris 8K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nex-N2.5-Mini$0.0001Fits in one request
Llama 3 8B Lunaris$0.0001Fits in one request

Llama 3 8B Lunaris costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nex-N2.5-Mini$0.0015Fits in one request
Llama 3 8B Lunaris$0.0022Exceeds the context window

Nex-N2.5-Mini costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nex-N2.5-Mini$0.0060Fits in one request
Llama 3 8B Lunaris$0.0085Exceeds the context window

Nex-N2.5-Mini costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nex-N2.5-Mini and Llama 3 8B Lunaris
SpecificationNex AGI Nex-N2.5-MiniSao10K Llama 3 8B Lunaris
MakerNex AGISao10K
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 8, 2026August 13, 2024
Context window262K8K
Input $/Mtok$0.025$0.04
Output $/Mtok$0.10$0.05
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nex-N2.5-Mini better than Llama 3 8B Lunaris for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nex-N2.5-Mini for a larger context window (262K against 8K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Nex-N2.5-Mini or Llama 3 8B Lunaris?

Nex-N2.5-Mini costs $0.025 per million input tokens and $0.10 per million output tokens; Llama 3 8B Lunaris costs $0.04 and $0.05. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nex-N2.5-Mini or Llama 3 8B Lunaris?

Nex-N2.5-Mini, with 262K tokens against 8K.

Has any benchmark tested both Nex-N2.5-Mini and Llama 3 8B Lunaris?

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them. Data as of October 23, 2026.

Compare next