Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Moondream 3 Preview vs Perceptron Mk1

Updated October 21, 2026. 0 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

M Moondream 3 PreviewMoondream
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.50
Perceptron Mk1Perceptron
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
vs $2.50 vs $1.50 per 1M output tokens. Perceptron Mk1 is 1.7x cheaper.

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
0
Moondream 3 Preview only
0
Perceptron Mk1 only
0
Like-for-like categories
0 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Moondream 3 Preview not benchmarked, Perceptron Mk1 not benchmarked.
Widest category
No category has a result for both models.
Widest single gap
No benchmark has a result for both models.
Output price
Moondream 3 Preview $2.50 against Perceptron Mk1 $1.50 per million output tokens, 1.7x apart.
Context window
Moondream 3 Preview takes 32K tokens, Perceptron Mk1 33K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

CodingNot comparableSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index0 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Moondream 3 Preview and Perceptron Mk1
BenchmarkMoondream 3 PreviewPerceptron Mk1Leader
Neither model has a result on 38 boards here
IntelligenceNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Moondream 3 Preview and Perceptron Mk1
BenchmarkMoondream 3 PreviewPerceptron Mk1Leader
Neither model has a result on 2 boards here
Agentic workNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Moondream 3 Preview and Perceptron Mk1
BenchmarkMoondream 3 PreviewPerceptron Mk1Leader
Neither model has a result on 39 boards here
ReasoningNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Moondream 3 Preview and Perceptron Mk1
BenchmarkMoondream 3 PreviewPerceptron Mk1Leader
Neither model has a result on 21 boards here
MathNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Moondream 3 Preview and Perceptron Mk1
BenchmarkMoondream 3 PreviewPerceptron Mk1Leader
Neither model has a result on 13 boards here
KnowledgeNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Moondream 3 Preview and Perceptron Mk1
BenchmarkMoondream 3 PreviewPerceptron Mk1Leader
Neither model has a result on 17 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Moondream 3 Preview and Perceptron Mk1
BenchmarkMoondream 3 PreviewPerceptron Mk1Leader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Moondream 3 Preview and Perceptron Mk1
BenchmarkMoondream 3 PreviewPerceptron Mk1Leader
Neither model has a result on 46 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Moondream 3 Preview and Perceptron Mk1
BenchmarkMoondream 3 PreviewPerceptron Mk1Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Moondream 3 Preview$0.0015Fits in one request
Perceptron Mk1$0.0009Fits in one request

Perceptron Mk1 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Moondream 3 Preview$0.022Exceeds the context window
Perceptron Mk1$0.012Exceeds the context window

Perceptron Mk1 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Moondream 3 Preview$0.085Exceeds the context window
Perceptron Mk1$0.045Exceeds the context window

Perceptron Mk1 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Moondream 3 Preview and Perceptron Mk1
SpecificationMoondream 3 PreviewPerceptron Mk1
MakerMoondreamPerceptron
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 15, 2026May 12, 2026
Context window32K33K
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.15
Output $/Mtok$2.50$1.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Moondream 3 Preview better than Perceptron Mk1 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Moondream 3 Preview or Perceptron Mk1?

Moondream 3 Preview costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Perceptron Mk1 costs $0.15 and $1.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Moondream 3 Preview or Perceptron Mk1?

Perceptron Mk1, with 33K tokens against 32K.

How many benchmarks is the Moondream 3 Preview vs Perceptron Mk1 comparison based on?

0 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Moondream 3 Preview's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Perceptron Mk1's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next