Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Mistral Small 3.2 24B vs Qwen3 Coder Flash

Mistral Small 3.2 24B costs 3.3x less per output token than Qwen3 Coder Flash ($0.30 vs $0.975 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Replace Mistral Small 3.2 24B Replace Qwen3 Coder Flash
Mistral Small 3.2 24BMistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.30
Qwen3 Coder FlashQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.975
vs $0.30 vs $0.975 per 1M output tokens. Mistral Small 3.2 24B is 3.3x cheaper.

Mistral Small 3.2 24B or Qwen3 Coder Flash: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Mistral Small 3.2 24B for output tokens 3.3x cheaper ($0.30 vs $0.975 per million).

Model AMistral Small 3.2 24BMistral AINot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BQwen3 Coder FlashQwenNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task

No benchmark has tested both yet. Mistral Small 3.2 24B has results on Design Arena: websites, Design Arena: UI components and Design Arena: game dev; Qwen3 Coder Flash has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Mistral Small 3.2 24B not benchmarked, Qwen3 Coder Flash not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Mistral Small 3.2 24B $0.30 against Qwen3 Coder Flash $0.975 per million output tokens, 3.3x apart.
Context window
Mistral Small 3.2 24B takes 256K tokens, Qwen3 Coder Flash 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Mistral Small 3.2 24B and Qwen3 Coder Flash
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2 24BQwen3 Coder FlashLeader
Design Arena: websites896Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.2 24B measured
Design Arena: UI components907Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.2 24B measured
Design Arena: game dev888Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.2 24B measured
Design Arena: data viz929Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.2 24B measured
Design Arena: all code categories907Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.2 24B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Mistral Small 3.2 24B$0.0003Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder Flash$0.0007Fits in one request

Mistral Small 3.2 24B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Mistral Small 3.2 24B$0.0059Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder Flash$0.013Fits in one request

Mistral Small 3.2 24B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Mistral Small 3.2 24B$0.023Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder Flash$0.049Fits in one request

Mistral Small 3.2 24B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Mistral Small 3.2 24B and Qwen3 Coder Flash
SpecificationMistral Small 3.2 24BQwen3 Coder Flash
MakerMistral AIQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedJune 20, 2025September 17, 2025
Context window256K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.10$0.195
Output $/Mtok$0.30$0.975
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Mistral Small 3.2 24B better than Qwen3 Coder Flash for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Mistral Small 3.2 24B for output tokens 3.3x cheaper ($0.30 vs $0.975 per million).

Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 3.2 24B or Qwen3 Coder Flash?

Mistral Small 3.2 24B costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder Flash costs $0.195 and $0.975. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Mistral Small 3.2 24B or Qwen3 Coder Flash?

Qwen3 Coder Flash, with 1M tokens against 256K.

Has any benchmark tested both Mistral Small 3.2 24B and Qwen3 Coder Flash?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Mistral Small 3.2 24B has results on Design Arena: websites, Design Arena: UI components and Design Arena: game dev; Qwen3 Coder Flash has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next