Mistral Large 2407 vs Sonar Pro
Mistral Large 2407 and Sonar Pro tie on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index at 7.6, and Mistral Large 2407 costs 2.5x less per output token ($6.00 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 5 benchmarks have a result for both.
Mistral Large 2407 or Sonar Pro: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Mistral Large 2407 for output tokens 2.5x cheaper ($6.00 vs $15.00 per million) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.
- Shared results
- 5
- Mistral Large 2407 only
- 12
- Sonar Pro only
- 0
- Like-for-like categories
- 4 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Tied at 7.6.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Sonar Pro
Sonar Pro takes 200K tokens against 131K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Mistral Large 2407
Mistral Large 2407 $0.0050, Sonar Pro $0.011 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Mistral Large 2407 not benchmarked, Sonar Pro not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Knowledge, 7.2 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run): Mistral Large 2407 47.2% against Sonar Pro 57.8%, 10.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Mistral Large 2407 $6.00 against Sonar Pro $15.00 per million output tokens, 2.5x apart.
- Context window
- Mistral Large 2407 takes 131K tokens, Sonar Pro 200K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Mistral Large 2407 | Bars | Sonar Pro | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 1 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 0 | 1 tie | |
| Reasoning | 0 | 2 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 1 | ||
| All shared boards | 0 | 4 | 1 tie |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 2407 | Sonar Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 26.7% | 27.5% | Sonar Pro |
| Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index00
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 2407 | Sonar Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 7.6 | 7.6 | Tie |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 2407 | Sonar Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 33.0% | Not measured | Only Mistral Large 2407 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 2407 | Sonar Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 47.2% | 57.8% | Sonar Pro |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 2.9% | 6.6% | Sonar Pro |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 49.0% | Not measured | Only Mistral Large 2407 measured |
| SimpleBench | 22.5% | Not measured | Only Mistral Large 2407 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 2407 | Sonar Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Math Index | 0.0 | Not measured | Only Mistral Large 2407 measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 0.0% | Not measured | Only Mistral Large 2407 measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 8.5% | Not measured | Only Mistral Large 2407 measured |
| MATH level 5 | 44.8% | Not measured | Only Mistral Large 2407 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 2407 | Sonar Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 68.3% | 75.5% | Sonar Pro |
| MMLU | 80.0% | Not measured | Only Mistral Large 2407 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 2407 | Sonar Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 9 boards here | |||
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 2407 | Sonar Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | 31.6% | Not measured | Only Mistral Large 2407 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 2.0% | Not measured | Only Mistral Large 2407 measured |
| DTBench | 61.2% | Not measured | Only Mistral Large 2407 measured |
| Creative writing (Lech Mazur) | 69.0% | Not measured | Only Mistral Large 2407 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 42 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 2407 | Sonar Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Mistral Large 2407 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Mistral Large 2407 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Mistral Large 2407 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Mistral Large 2407 | Perplexity Sonar Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Mistral AI | Perplexity |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | November 19, 2024 | March 7, 2025 |
| Context window | 131K | 200K |
| Input $/Mtok | $2.00 | $3.00 |
| Output $/Mtok | $6.00 | $15.00 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Mistral Large 2407 better than Sonar Pro for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Mistral Large 2407 for output tokens 2.5x cheaper ($6.00 vs $15.00 per million) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Mistral Large 2407 or Sonar Pro?
Mistral Large 2407 costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $6.00 per million output tokens; Sonar Pro costs $3.00 and $15.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Mistral Large 2407 or Sonar Pro?
Sonar Pro, with 200K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks is the Mistral Large 2407 vs Sonar Pro comparison based on?
5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Mistral Large 2407's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Sonar Pro's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.