Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Ministral 3 3B 2512 vs ReMM SLERP 13B

Ministral 3 3B 2512 costs 6.5x less per output token than ReMM SLERP 13B ($0.10 vs $0.65 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Replace Ministral 3 3B 2512 Replace ReMM SLERP 13B
Ministral 3 3B 2512Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.10
U ReMM SLERP 13BUndi95
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.65
vs $0.10 vs $0.65 per 1M output tokens. Ministral 3 3B 2512 is 6.5x cheaper.

Ministral 3 3B 2512 or ReMM SLERP 13B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Ministral 3 3B 2512 for output tokens 6.5x cheaper ($0.10 vs $0.65 per million) and a larger context window (131K against 6K tokens).

Model AMinistral 3 3B 2512Mistral AINot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BReMM SLERP 13BUndi95Not benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task

No benchmark has tested both yet. Ministral 3 3B 2512 has results on AA Coding Index, AA Intelligence Index and AA Agentic Index; ReMM SLERP 13B has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Ministral 3 3B 2512 not benchmarked, ReMM SLERP 13B not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Ministral 3 3B 2512 $0.10 against ReMM SLERP 13B $0.65 per million output tokens, 6.5x apart.
Context window
Ministral 3 3B 2512 takes 131K tokens, ReMM SLERP 13B 6K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index1 board measured
Coding benchmarks for Ministral 3 3B 2512 and ReMM SLERP 13B
BenchmarkMinistral 3 3B 2512ReMM SLERP 13BLeader
AA Coding Index4.8Not measuredOnly Ministral 3 3B 2512 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 42 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Ministral 3 3B 2512 and ReMM SLERP 13B
BenchmarkMinistral 3 3B 2512ReMM SLERP 13BLeader
AA Intelligence Index4.8Not measuredOnly Ministral 3 3B 2512 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Ministral 3 3B 2512 and ReMM SLERP 13B
BenchmarkMinistral 3 3B 2512ReMM SLERP 13BLeader
AA Agentic Index0.8Not measuredOnly Ministral 3 3B 2512 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Ministral 3 3B 2512 and ReMM SLERP 13B
BenchmarkMinistral 3 3B 2512ReMM SLERP 13BLeader
Design Arena: websites1027Not measuredOnly Ministral 3 3B 2512 measured
Design Arena: game dev948Not measuredOnly Ministral 3 3B 2512 measured
Design Arena: 3D963Not measuredOnly Ministral 3 3B 2512 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1009Not measuredOnly Ministral 3 3B 2512 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Ministral 3 3B 2512$0.0001Fits in one request
ReMM SLERP 13B$0.0007Fits in one request

Ministral 3 3B 2512 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Ministral 3 3B 2512$0.0053Fits in one request
ReMM SLERP 13B$0.019Exceeds the context window

Ministral 3 3B 2512 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Ministral 3 3B 2512$0.021Exceeds the context window
ReMM SLERP 13B$0.076Exceeds the context window

Ministral 3 3B 2512 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Ministral 3 3B 2512 and ReMM SLERP 13B
SpecificationMistral Ministral 3 3B 2512ReMM SLERP 13B
MakerMistral AIUndi95
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 2, 2025July 22, 2023
Context window131K6K
Input $/Mtok$0.10$0.35
Output $/Mtok$0.10$0.65
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Ministral 3 3B 2512 better than ReMM SLERP 13B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Ministral 3 3B 2512 for output tokens 6.5x cheaper ($0.10 vs $0.65 per million) and a larger context window (131K against 6K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Ministral 3 3B 2512 or ReMM SLERP 13B?

Ministral 3 3B 2512 costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.10 per million output tokens; ReMM SLERP 13B costs $0.35 and $0.65. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Ministral 3 3B 2512 or ReMM SLERP 13B?

Ministral 3 3B 2512, with 131K tokens against 6K.

Has any benchmark tested both Ministral 3 3B 2512 and ReMM SLERP 13B?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Ministral 3 3B 2512 has results on AA Coding Index, AA Intelligence Index and AA Agentic Index; ReMM SLERP 13B has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 23, 2026.

Compare next