Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Ministral 3 14B 2512 vs UnslopNemo 12B

Ministral 3 14B 2512 costs 2.0x less per output token than UnslopNemo 12B ($0.20 vs $0.40 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Replace Ministral 3 14B 2512 Replace UnslopNemo 12B
Ministral 3 14B 2512Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
T UnslopNemo 12BTheDrummer
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.40
vs $0.20 vs $0.40 per 1M output tokens. Ministral 3 14B 2512 is 2.0x cheaper.

Ministral 3 14B 2512 or UnslopNemo 12B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Ministral 3 14B 2512 for output tokens 2.0x cheaper ($0.20 vs $0.40 per million).

Model AMinistral 3 14B 2512Mistral AINot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BUnslopNemo 12BTheDrummerNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task

No benchmark has tested both yet. Ministral 3 14B 2512 has results on AA Coding Index, AA Intelligence Index and AA Agentic Index; UnslopNemo 12B has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Ministral 3 14B 2512 not benchmarked, UnslopNemo 12B not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Ministral 3 14B 2512 $0.20 against UnslopNemo 12B $0.40 per million output tokens, 2.0x apart.
Context window
Ministral 3 14B 2512 takes 262K tokens, UnslopNemo 12B 1.02M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index1 board measured
Coding benchmarks for Ministral 3 14B 2512 and UnslopNemo 12B
BenchmarkMinistral 3 14B 2512UnslopNemo 12BLeader
AA Coding Index14.4Not measuredOnly Ministral 3 14B 2512 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 42 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Ministral 3 14B 2512 and UnslopNemo 12B
BenchmarkMinistral 3 14B 2512UnslopNemo 12BLeader
AA Intelligence Index6.0Not measuredOnly Ministral 3 14B 2512 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Ministral 3 14B 2512 and UnslopNemo 12B
BenchmarkMinistral 3 14B 2512UnslopNemo 12BLeader
AA Agentic Index1.1Not measuredOnly Ministral 3 14B 2512 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Ministral 3 14B 2512 and UnslopNemo 12B
BenchmarkMinistral 3 14B 2512UnslopNemo 12BLeader
Design Arena: websites1081Not measuredOnly Ministral 3 14B 2512 measured
Design Arena: game dev1037Not measuredOnly Ministral 3 14B 2512 measured
Design Arena: 3D991Not measuredOnly Ministral 3 14B 2512 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1064Not measuredOnly Ministral 3 14B 2512 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Ministral 3 14B 2512$0.0003Fits in one request
UnslopNemo 12B$0.0006Fits in one request

Ministral 3 14B 2512 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Ministral 3 14B 2512$0.011Fits in one request
UnslopNemo 12B$0.021Fits in one request

Ministral 3 14B 2512 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Ministral 3 14B 2512$0.042Fits in one request
UnslopNemo 12B$0.084Fits in one request

Ministral 3 14B 2512 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Ministral 3 14B 2512 and UnslopNemo 12B
SpecificationMistral Ministral 3 14B 2512TheDrummer UnslopNemo 12B
MakerMistral AITheDrummer
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 2, 2025November 8, 2024
Context window262K1.02M
Input $/Mtok$0.20$0.40
Output $/Mtok$0.20$0.40
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Ministral 3 14B 2512 better than UnslopNemo 12B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Ministral 3 14B 2512 for output tokens 2.0x cheaper ($0.20 vs $0.40 per million).

Which is cheaper, Ministral 3 14B 2512 or UnslopNemo 12B?

Ministral 3 14B 2512 costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; UnslopNemo 12B costs $0.40 and $0.40. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Ministral 3 14B 2512 or UnslopNemo 12B?

UnslopNemo 12B, with 1.02M tokens against 262K.

Has any benchmark tested both Ministral 3 14B 2512 and UnslopNemo 12B?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Ministral 3 14B 2512 has results on AA Coding Index, AA Intelligence Index and AA Agentic Index; UnslopNemo 12B has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 23, 2026.

Compare next