Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Ministral 3 14B 2512 vs Hy-MT2-30B-A3B

Ministral 3 14B 2512 costs 1.5x less per output token than Hy-MT2-30B-A3B ($0.20 vs $0.295 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Replace Ministral 3 14B 2512 Replace Hy-MT2-30B-A3B
Ministral 3 14B 2512Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
Hy-MT2-30B-A3BTencent
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.295
vs $0.20 vs $0.295 per 1M output tokens. Ministral 3 14B 2512 is 1.5x cheaper.

Ministral 3 14B 2512 or Hy-MT2-30B-A3B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Ministral 3 14B 2512 for output tokens 1.5x cheaper ($0.20 vs $0.295 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 8K tokens).

Model AMinistral 3 14B 2512Mistral AINot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BHy-MT2-30B-A3BTencentNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task

No benchmark has tested both yet. Ministral 3 14B 2512 has results on AA Coding Index, AA Intelligence Index and AA Agentic Index; Hy-MT2-30B-A3B has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Ministral 3 14B 2512 not benchmarked, Hy-MT2-30B-A3B not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Ministral 3 14B 2512 $0.20 against Hy-MT2-30B-A3B $0.295 per million output tokens, 1.5x apart.
Context window
Ministral 3 14B 2512 takes 262K tokens, Hy-MT2-30B-A3B 8K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index1 board measured
Coding benchmarks for Ministral 3 14B 2512 and Hy-MT2-30B-A3B
BenchmarkMinistral 3 14B 2512Hy-MT2-30B-A3BLeader
AA Coding Index14.4Not measuredOnly Ministral 3 14B 2512 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 42 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Ministral 3 14B 2512 and Hy-MT2-30B-A3B
BenchmarkMinistral 3 14B 2512Hy-MT2-30B-A3BLeader
AA Intelligence Index6.0Not measuredOnly Ministral 3 14B 2512 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Ministral 3 14B 2512 and Hy-MT2-30B-A3B
BenchmarkMinistral 3 14B 2512Hy-MT2-30B-A3BLeader
AA Agentic Index1.1Not measuredOnly Ministral 3 14B 2512 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Ministral 3 14B 2512 and Hy-MT2-30B-A3B
BenchmarkMinistral 3 14B 2512Hy-MT2-30B-A3BLeader
Design Arena: websites1081Not measuredOnly Ministral 3 14B 2512 measured
Design Arena: game dev1037Not measuredOnly Ministral 3 14B 2512 measured
Design Arena: 3D989Not measuredOnly Ministral 3 14B 2512 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1064Not measuredOnly Ministral 3 14B 2512 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Ministral 3 14B 2512$0.0003Fits in one request
Hy-MT2-30B-A3B$0.0002Fits in one request

Hy-MT2-30B-A3B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Ministral 3 14B 2512$0.011Fits in one request
Hy-MT2-30B-A3B$0.0046Exceeds the context window

Hy-MT2-30B-A3B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Ministral 3 14B 2512$0.042Fits in one request
Hy-MT2-30B-A3B$0.018Exceeds the context window

Hy-MT2-30B-A3B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Ministral 3 14B 2512 and Hy-MT2-30B-A3B
SpecificationMistral Ministral 3 14B 2512Tencent Hy-MT2-30B-A3B
MakerMistral AITencent
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 2, 2025August 20, 2026
Context window262K8K
Input $/Mtok$0.20$0.074
Output $/Mtok$0.20$0.295
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Ministral 3 14B 2512 better than Hy-MT2-30B-A3B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Ministral 3 14B 2512 for output tokens 1.5x cheaper ($0.20 vs $0.295 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 8K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Ministral 3 14B 2512 or Hy-MT2-30B-A3B?

Ministral 3 14B 2512 costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Hy-MT2-30B-A3B costs $0.074 and $0.295. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Ministral 3 14B 2512 or Hy-MT2-30B-A3B?

Ministral 3 14B 2512, with 262K tokens against 8K.

Has any benchmark tested both Ministral 3 14B 2512 and Hy-MT2-30B-A3B?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Ministral 3 14B 2512 has results on AA Coding Index, AA Intelligence Index and AA Agentic Index; Hy-MT2-30B-A3B has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next