Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Ministral 3 14B 2512 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 leads Ministral 3 14B 2512 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 12.7 to 6.0, and Ministral 3 14B 2512 costs 17.5x less per output token ($0.20 vs $3.50 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 7 benchmarks have a result for both.

Ministral 3 14B 2512Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
3
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
52.9
Output $/M
$3.50
4
vs boards won of 7 shared

Ministral 3 14B 2512 or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Ministral 3 14B 2512 for output tokens 17.5x cheaper ($0.20 vs $3.50 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 128K tokens).

Shared results
7
Ministral 3 14B 2512 only
0
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 only
39
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Ministral 3 14B 2512 not benchmarked, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 7.7 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: game dev: Ministral 3 14B 2512 1037 against Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 956, 10.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Ministral 3 14B 2512 $0.20 against Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 $3.50 per million output tokens, 17.5x apart.
Context window
Ministral 3 14B 2512 takes 262K tokens, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMinistral 3 14B 2512BarsQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Ties
Coding01
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Web design31
All shared boards34
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for Ministral 3 14B 2512 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkMinistral 3 14B 2512Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
AA Coding Index14.422.1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
WeirdMLNot measured41.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1424Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1431Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Ministral 3 14B 2512 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkMinistral 3 14B 2512Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
AA Intelligence Index6.012.7Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Ministral 3 14B 2512 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkMinistral 3 14B 2512Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
AA Agentic Index1.11.3Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Vending-Bench 2Not measured-$11Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Ministral 3 14B 2512 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkMinistral 3 14B 2512Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured80.1%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured9.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1416Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1463Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1432Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Ministral 3 14B 2512 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkMinistral 3 14B 2512Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured86.7%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1412Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1435Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Ministral 3 14B 2512 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkMinistral 3 14B 2512Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured40.4%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1433Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1456Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1415Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1412Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index31
Web design benchmarks for Ministral 3 14B 2512 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkMinistral 3 14B 2512Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
Design Arena: websites10811052Ministral 3 14B 2512
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured942Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: game dev1037956Ministral 3 14B 2512
Design Arena: data vizNot measured950Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: 3D991998Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Design Arena: all code categories10641032Ministral 3 14B 2512
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Ministral 3 14B 2512 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkMinistral 3 14B 2512Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
DTBenchNot measured80.3%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMCANot measured29.3%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured75.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured82.4%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1415Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1386Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1384Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1429Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1397Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1481Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1408Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1386Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1375Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1389Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1400Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1390Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1406Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1399Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1388Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1370Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Ministral 3 14B 2512 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkMinistral 3 14B 2512Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Ministral 3 14B 2512$0.0003Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.0022Fits in one request

Ministral 3 14B 2512 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Ministral 3 14B 2512$0.011Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.033Fits in one request

Ministral 3 14B 2512 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Ministral 3 14B 2512$0.042Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.125Exceeds the context window

Ministral 3 14B 2512 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Ministral 3 14B 2512 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
SpecificationMistral Ministral 3 14B 2512Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
MakerMistral AIQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 2, 2025July 25, 2025
Context window262K128K
Input $/Mtok$0.20$0.45
Output $/Mtok$0.20$3.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Ministral 3 14B 2512 better than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Ministral 3 14B 2512 for output tokens 17.5x cheaper ($0.20 vs $3.50 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 128K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Ministral 3 14B 2512 or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Ministral 3 14B 2512 costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs $0.45 and $3.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Ministral 3 14B 2512 or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Ministral 3 14B 2512, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Ministral 3 14B 2512 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 comparison based on?

7 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. Ministral 3 14B 2512's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next