Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MiniMax M2 vs Nemotron 3 Super

MiniMax M2 leads Nemotron 3 Super on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 18.6 to 12.8, and Nemotron 3 Super costs 2.3x less per output token ($0.45 vs $1.02 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 33 benchmarks have a result for both.

MiniMax M2MiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.02
4
Nemotron 3 SuperNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.45
29
vs boards won of 33 shared

MiniMax M2 or Nemotron 3 Super: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick MiniMax M2 for work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Shared results
33
MiniMax M2 only
17
Nemotron 3 Super only
6
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
MiniMax M2 not benchmarked, Nemotron 3 Super not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 19.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: MiniMax M2 86.8% against Nemotron 3 Super 67.8%, 19.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
MiniMax M2 $1.02 against Nemotron 3 Super $0.45 per million output tokens, 2.3x apart.
Context window
MiniMax M2 takes 205K tokens, Nemotron 3 Super 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMiniMax M2BarsNemotron 3 SuperTies
Coding03
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
General215
All shared boards429
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for MiniMax M2 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkMiniMax M2Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
SWE-bench Verified61.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena WebDev1297Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured37.7Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)82.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
SciCodeNot measured36.2%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)25.8%28.8%Nemotron 3 Super
Terminal-Bench30.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
WeirdMLNot measured38.0%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
ALE-BenchNot measured213.9Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: coding13711403Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: software and IT13731409Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena WebDev: HTML1306Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for MiniMax M2 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkMiniMax M2Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
AA Intelligence Index18.612.8MiniMax M2
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for MiniMax M2 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkMiniMax M2Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.7Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
τ²-Bench Telecom86.8%67.8%MiniMax M2
Vending-Bench 2$161Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for MiniMax M2 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkMiniMax M2Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)77.7%80.0%Nemotron 3 Super
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)13.7%20.8%Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: hard prompts13571386Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: expert13381398Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13761397Nemotron 3 Super
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for MiniMax M2 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkMiniMax M2Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
AA Math Index78.3Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)78.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: math13511380Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: mathematical work13681405Nemotron 3 Super
MathArenaNot measured16.6%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for MiniMax M2 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkMiniMax M2Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)82.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: science13481387Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13671383Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: legal and government13491392Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: business and finance13361364Nemotron 3 Super
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for MiniMax M2 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkMiniMax M2Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
Design Arena: websites1143Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: UI components1134Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: game dev1118Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: data viz1140Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: 3D1098Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1135Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: SVG1100Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index215
General benchmarks for MiniMax M2 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkMiniMax M2Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
IFBench72.3%71.5%MiniMax M2
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)64.3%65.7%Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text13401378Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: instruction following13291347Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: creative writing12861317Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: English13641400Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: non-English13131356Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: Chinese13661431Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: German13571341MiniMax M2
LMArena Text: French13361403Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: Spanish13261418Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: Russian13301336Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: Polish13121346Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: multi-turn13611369Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: longer queries13311362Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: writing and language12951332Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12981336Nemotron 3 Super
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for MiniMax M2 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkMiniMax M2Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

MiniMax M2$0.0008Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Super$0.0003Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

MiniMax M2$0.016Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Super$0.0056Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

MiniMax M2$0.061Exceeds the context window
Nemotron 3 Super$0.021Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of MiniMax M2 and Nemotron 3 Super
SpecificationMiniMax M2NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super
MakerMiniMaxNVIDIA
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 23, 2025March 11, 2026
Context window205K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.255$0.085
Output $/Mtok$1.02$0.45
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved task$0.702Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is MiniMax M2 better than Nemotron 3 Super for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick MiniMax M2 for work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M2 or Nemotron 3 Super?

MiniMax M2 costs $0.255 per million input tokens and $1.02 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Super costs $0.085 and $0.45. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M2 only.

Which has the bigger context window, MiniMax M2 or Nemotron 3 Super?

Nemotron 3 Super, with 262K tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks is the MiniMax M2 vs Nemotron 3 Super comparison based on?

33 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. MiniMax M2's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Nemotron 3 Super's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next