Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MiniMax M2 vs Mistral Large 2407

MiniMax M2 leads Mistral Large 2407 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 18.6 to 7.6, and MiniMax M2 costs 5.9x less per output token ($1.02 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 10 benchmarks have a result for both.

MiniMax M2MiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.02
10
Mistral Large 2407Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$6.00
0
vs boards won of 10 shared

MiniMax M2 or Mistral Large 2407: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick MiniMax M2 for output tokens 5.9x cheaper ($1.02 vs $6.00 per million) and a larger context window (205K against 131K tokens).

Shared results
10
MiniMax M2 only
40
Mistral Large 2407 only
7
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
MiniMax M2 not benchmarked, Mistral Large 2407 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 78.3 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run): MiniMax M2 78.3% against Mistral Large 2407 0.0%, 78.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
MiniMax M2 $1.02 against Mistral Large 2407 $6.00 per million output tokens, 5.9x apart.
Context window
MiniMax M2 takes 205K tokens, Mistral Large 2407 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMiniMax M2BarsMistral Large 2407Ties
Coding10
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning20
Math20
Knowledge10
General20
All shared boards100
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for MiniMax M2 and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkMiniMax M2Mistral Large 2407Leader
SWE-bench Verified61.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena WebDev1297Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)82.6%26.7%MiniMax M2
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)25.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Terminal-Bench30.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: coding1371Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1373Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1306Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for MiniMax M2 and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkMiniMax M2Mistral Large 2407Leader
AA Intelligence Index18.67.6MiniMax M2
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for MiniMax M2 and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkMiniMax M2Mistral Large 2407Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom86.8%33.0%MiniMax M2
Vending-Bench 2$161Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for MiniMax M2 and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkMiniMax M2Mistral Large 2407Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)77.7%47.2%MiniMax M2
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)13.7%2.9%MiniMax M2
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured49.0%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
SimpleBenchNot measured22.5%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1357Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: expert1338Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1376Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for MiniMax M2 and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkMiniMax M2Mistral Large 2407Leader
AA Math Index78.30.0MiniMax M2
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)78.3%0.0%MiniMax M2
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured8.5%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
MATH level 5Not measured44.8%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
LMArena Text: math1351Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1368Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Knowledge benchmarks for MiniMax M2 and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkMiniMax M2Mistral Large 2407Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)82.0%68.3%MiniMax M2
MMLUNot measured80.0%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
LMArena Text: science1348Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1367Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1349Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1336Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for MiniMax M2 and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkMiniMax M2Mistral Large 2407Leader
Design Arena: websites1143Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: UI components1137Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: game dev1118Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: data viz1140Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: 3D1098Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1135Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: SVG1100Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for MiniMax M2 and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkMiniMax M2Mistral Large 2407Leader
IFBench72.3%31.6%MiniMax M2
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)64.3%2.0%MiniMax M2
DTBenchNot measured61.2%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured69.0%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
LMArena Text1340Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1329Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1286Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: English1364Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1313Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1366Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: German1357Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: French1336Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1326Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1330Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1312Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1361Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1331Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1295Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1298Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for MiniMax M2 and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkMiniMax M2Mistral Large 2407Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

MiniMax M2$0.0008Fits in one request
Mistral Large 2407$0.0050Fits in one request

MiniMax M2 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

MiniMax M2$0.016Fits in one request
Mistral Large 2407$0.118Fits in one request

MiniMax M2 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

MiniMax M2$0.061Exceeds the context window
Mistral Large 2407$0.460Exceeds the context window

MiniMax M2 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of MiniMax M2 and Mistral Large 2407
SpecificationMiniMax M2Mistral Large 2407
MakerMiniMaxMistral AI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 23, 2025November 19, 2024
Context window205K131K
Input $/Mtok$0.255$2.00
Output $/Mtok$1.02$6.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved task$0.702Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is MiniMax M2 better than Mistral Large 2407 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick MiniMax M2 for output tokens 5.9x cheaper ($1.02 vs $6.00 per million) and a larger context window (205K against 131K tokens).

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M2 or Mistral Large 2407?

MiniMax M2 costs $0.255 per million input tokens and $1.02 per million output tokens; Mistral Large 2407 costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M2 only.

Which has the bigger context window, MiniMax M2 or Mistral Large 2407?

MiniMax M2, with 205K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the MiniMax M2 vs Mistral Large 2407 comparison based on?

10 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. MiniMax M2's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Mistral Large 2407's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next