Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MiniMax M2 vs Ministral 3 14B 2512

MiniMax M2 leads Ministral 3 14B 2512 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 18.6 to 6.0, and Ministral 3 14B 2512 costs 5.1x less per output token ($0.20 vs $1.02 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 5 benchmarks have a result for both.

MiniMax M2MiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.02
5
Ministral 3 14B 2512Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
0
vs boards won of 5 shared

MiniMax M2 or Ministral 3 14B 2512: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
5
MiniMax M2 only
45
Ministral 3 14B 2512 only
2
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
MiniMax M2 not benchmarked, Ministral 3 14B 2512 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 12.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: 3D: MiniMax M2 1098 against Ministral 3 14B 2512 989, 13.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
MiniMax M2 $1.02 against Ministral 3 14B 2512 $0.20 per million output tokens, 5.1x apart.
Context window
MiniMax M2 takes 205K tokens, Ministral 3 14B 2512 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMiniMax M2BarsMinistral 3 14B 2512Ties
Intelligence10
Web design40
All shared boards50
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index9 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for MiniMax M2 and Ministral 3 14B 2512
BenchmarkMiniMax M2Ministral 3 14B 2512Leader
SWE-bench Verified61.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena WebDev1297Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured14.4Only Ministral 3 14B 2512 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)82.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)25.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Terminal-Bench30.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: coding1371Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1373Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1306Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for MiniMax M2 and Ministral 3 14B 2512
BenchmarkMiniMax M2Ministral 3 14B 2512Leader
AA Intelligence Index18.66.0MiniMax M2
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for MiniMax M2 and Ministral 3 14B 2512
BenchmarkMiniMax M2Ministral 3 14B 2512Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.1Only Ministral 3 14B 2512 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom86.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Vending-Bench 2$161Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for MiniMax M2 and Ministral 3 14B 2512
BenchmarkMiniMax M2Ministral 3 14B 2512Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)77.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)13.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1357Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: expert1338Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1376Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for MiniMax M2 and Ministral 3 14B 2512
BenchmarkMiniMax M2Ministral 3 14B 2512Leader
AA Math Index78.3Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)78.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: math1351Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1368Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for MiniMax M2 and Ministral 3 14B 2512
BenchmarkMiniMax M2Ministral 3 14B 2512Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)82.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: science1348Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1367Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1349Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1336Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Web design benchmarks for MiniMax M2 and Ministral 3 14B 2512
BenchmarkMiniMax M2Ministral 3 14B 2512Leader
Design Arena: websites11431081MiniMax M2
Design Arena: UI components1134Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: game dev11181037MiniMax M2
Design Arena: data viz1140Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: 3D1098989MiniMax M2
Design Arena: all code categories11351064MiniMax M2
Design Arena: SVG1100Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for MiniMax M2 and Ministral 3 14B 2512
BenchmarkMiniMax M2Ministral 3 14B 2512Leader
IFBench72.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)64.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text1340Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1329Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1286Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: English1364Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1313Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1366Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: German1357Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: French1336Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1326Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1330Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1312Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1361Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1331Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1295Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1298Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for MiniMax M2 and Ministral 3 14B 2512
BenchmarkMiniMax M2Ministral 3 14B 2512Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

MiniMax M2$0.0008Fits in one request
Ministral 3 14B 2512$0.0003Fits in one request

Ministral 3 14B 2512 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

MiniMax M2$0.016Fits in one request
Ministral 3 14B 2512$0.011Fits in one request

Ministral 3 14B 2512 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

MiniMax M2$0.061Exceeds the context window
Ministral 3 14B 2512$0.042Fits in one request

Ministral 3 14B 2512 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of MiniMax M2 and Ministral 3 14B 2512
SpecificationMiniMax M2Mistral Ministral 3 14B 2512
MakerMiniMaxMistral AI
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 23, 2025December 2, 2025
Context window205K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.255$0.20
Output $/Mtok$1.02$0.20
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved task$0.702Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is MiniMax M2 better than Ministral 3 14B 2512 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M2 or Ministral 3 14B 2512?

MiniMax M2 costs $0.255 per million input tokens and $1.02 per million output tokens; Ministral 3 14B 2512 costs $0.20 and $0.20. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M2 only.

Which has the bigger context window, MiniMax M2 or Ministral 3 14B 2512?

Ministral 3 14B 2512, with 262K tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks is the MiniMax M2 vs Ministral 3 14B 2512 comparison based on?

5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. MiniMax M2's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Ministral 3 14B 2512's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next