Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MiniMax M1 vs Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct

MiniMax M1 leads Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 11.7 to 9.6, and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct costs 5.0x less per output token ($0.44 vs $2.20 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 1 benchmarks have a result for both.

MiniMax M1MiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.20
1
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.44
0
vs boards won of 1 shared

MiniMax M1 or Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick MiniMax M1 for a larger context window (1M against 262K tokens).

Shared results
1
MiniMax M1 only
28
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct only
15
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
MiniMax M1 not benchmarked, Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 2.1 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: MiniMax M1 11.7 against Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct 9.6, 2.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
MiniMax M1 $2.20 against Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct $0.44 per million output tokens, 5.0x apart.
Context window
MiniMax M1 takes 1M tokens, Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMiniMax M1BarsQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructTies
Intelligence10
All shared boards10
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index6 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured60.4%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
SWE-bench LiteNot measured49.7%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured40.3%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured15.2%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: coding1359Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1359Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index11.79.6MiniMax M1
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured34.5%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured51.6%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured3.8%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1339Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: expert1317Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1353Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured29.0Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured29.0%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math1361Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1363Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured70.6%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science1354Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1355Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1337Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1319Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1087Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1046Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1085Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
IFBenchNot measured32.7%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured32.7%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text1343Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1312Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1297Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: English1363Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1319Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1360Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: German1350Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1217Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1266Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: French1370Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1353Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1329Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1329Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1335Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1326Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1311Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1303Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

MiniMax M1$0.0015Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct$0.0003Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

MiniMax M1$0.027Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct$0.0068Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

MiniMax M1$0.102Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct$0.026Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of MiniMax M1 and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
SpecificationMiniMax M1Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
MakerMiniMaxQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJune 17, 2025July 31, 2025
Context window1M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.40$0.11
Output $/Mtok$2.20$0.44
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is MiniMax M1 better than Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick MiniMax M1 for a larger context window (1M against 262K tokens).

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M1 or Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct?

MiniMax M1 costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct costs $0.11 and $0.44. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, MiniMax M1 or Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct?

MiniMax M1, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the MiniMax M1 vs Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. MiniMax M1's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next