Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MiniMax M1 vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B leads MiniMax M1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 11.9 to 11.7, and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B costs 1.5x less per output token ($1.50 vs $2.20 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 29 benchmarks have a result for both.

MiniMax M1MiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.20
5
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
24
vs boards won of 29 shared

MiniMax M1 or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick MiniMax M1 for a larger context window (1M against 262K tokens) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Shared results
29
MiniMax M1 only
0
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B only
24
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
MiniMax M1 not benchmarked, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 7.3 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: Japanese: MiniMax M1 1217 against Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B 1311, 15.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
MiniMax M1 $2.20 against Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B $1.50 per million output tokens, 1.5x apart.
Context window
MiniMax M1 takes 1M tokens, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMiniMax M1BarsQwen3 Coder 480B A35BTies
Coding02
Intelligence01
Reasoning03
Math02
Knowledge22
General314
All shared boards524
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured69.6%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1275Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured58.5%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured18.9%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured27.2%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
GSO-BenchNot measured4.9%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
WeirdMLNot measured41.2%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
ALE-BenchNot measured461.4Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: coding13591412Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: software and IT13591393Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1257Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1287Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
AA Intelligence Index11.711.9Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured43.6%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured61.8%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured4.5%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13391372Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: expert13171338Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13531380Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured49.5%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured39.3Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured39.3%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: math13611365Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: mathematical work13631367Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22
Knowledge benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured78.8%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: science13541347MiniMax M1
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13551347MiniMax M1
LMArena Text: legal and government13371358Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: business and finance13191343Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1158Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1110Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1098Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1084Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1142Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index314
General benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
IFBenchNot measured40.5%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured45.7%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text13431357Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: instruction following13121355Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: creative writing12971333Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: English13631359MiniMax M1
LMArena Text: non-English13191346Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: Chinese13601357MiniMax M1
LMArena Text: German13501325MiniMax M1
LMArena Text: Japanese12171311Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: Korean12661305Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: French13701398Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: Spanish13531360Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: Russian13291366Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: Polish13291344Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: multi-turn13351366Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: longer queries13261378Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: writing and language13111340Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13031317Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

MiniMax M1$0.0015Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B$0.0010Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

MiniMax M1$0.027Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B$0.019Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

MiniMax M1$0.102Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B$0.075Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of MiniMax M1 and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
SpecificationMiniMax M1Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
MakerMiniMaxQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJune 17, 2025July 23, 2025
Context window1M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.40$0.30
Output $/Mtok$2.20$1.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is MiniMax M1 better than Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick MiniMax M1 for a larger context window (1M against 262K tokens) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M1 or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

MiniMax M1 costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B costs $0.30 and $1.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, MiniMax M1 or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

MiniMax M1, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the MiniMax M1 vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B comparison based on?

29 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. MiniMax M1's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next