Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MiniMax M1 vs o3 Mini High

MiniMax M1 leads o3 Mini High on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 11.7 to 11.0, and MiniMax M1 costs 2.0x less per output token ($2.20 vs $4.40 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 1 benchmarks have a result for both.

MiniMax M1MiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.20
1
o3 Mini HighOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.40
0
vs boards won of 1 shared

MiniMax M1 or o3 Mini High: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick MiniMax M1 for output tokens 2.0x cheaper ($2.20 vs $4.40 per million) and a larger context window (1M against 200K tokens).

Shared results
1
MiniMax M1 only
28
o3 Mini High only
2
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
MiniMax M1 not benchmarked, o3 Mini High not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 0.7 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: MiniMax M1 11.7 against o3 Mini High 11.0, 0.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
MiniMax M1 $2.20 against o3 Mini High $4.40 per million output tokens, 2.0x apart.
Context window
MiniMax M1 takes 1M tokens, o3 Mini High 200K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMiniMax M1Barso3 Mini HighTies
Intelligence10
All shared boards10
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index3 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and o3 Mini High
BenchmarkMiniMax M1o3 Mini HighLeader
AA Coding IndexNot measured16.3Only o3 Mini High measured
LMArena Text: coding1359Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1359Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and o3 Mini High
BenchmarkMiniMax M1o3 Mini HighLeader
AA Intelligence Index11.711.0MiniMax M1
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and o3 Mini High
BenchmarkMiniMax M1o3 Mini HighLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured0.9Only o3 Mini High measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and o3 Mini High
BenchmarkMiniMax M1o3 Mini HighLeader
LMArena Text: hard prompts1339Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: expert1317Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1353Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and o3 Mini High
BenchmarkMiniMax M1o3 Mini HighLeader
LMArena Text: math1361Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1363Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and o3 Mini High
BenchmarkMiniMax M1o3 Mini HighLeader
LMArena Text: science1354Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1355Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1337Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1319Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and o3 Mini High
BenchmarkMiniMax M1o3 Mini HighLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and o3 Mini High
BenchmarkMiniMax M1o3 Mini HighLeader
LMArena Text1343Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1312Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1297Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: English1363Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1319Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1360Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: German1350Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1217Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1266Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: French1370Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1353Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1329Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1329Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1335Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1326Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1311Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1303Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and o3 Mini High
BenchmarkMiniMax M1o3 Mini HighLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

MiniMax M1$0.0015Fits in one request
o3 Mini High$0.0033Fits in one request

MiniMax M1 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

MiniMax M1$0.027Fits in one request
o3 Mini High$0.068Fits in one request

MiniMax M1 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

MiniMax M1$0.102Fits in one request
o3 Mini High$0.264Exceeds the context window

MiniMax M1 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of MiniMax M1 and o3 Mini High
SpecificationMiniMax M1OpenAI o3 Mini High
MakerMiniMaxOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJune 17, 2025February 12, 2025
Context window1M200K
Input $/Mtok$0.40$1.10
Output $/Mtok$2.20$4.40
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is MiniMax M1 better than o3 Mini High for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick MiniMax M1 for output tokens 2.0x cheaper ($2.20 vs $4.40 per million) and a larger context window (1M against 200K tokens).

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M1 or o3 Mini High?

MiniMax M1 costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.20 per million output tokens; o3 Mini High costs $1.10 and $4.40. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, MiniMax M1 or o3 Mini High?

MiniMax M1, with 1M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the MiniMax M1 vs o3 Mini High comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. MiniMax M1's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and o3 Mini High's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next