Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MiniMax M1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL leads MiniMax M1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 26.5 to 11.7, and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs 4.4x less per output token ($0.50 vs $2.20 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 1 benchmarks have a result for both.

MiniMax M1MiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.20
0
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
35.6
Output $/M
$0.50
1
vs boards won of 1 shared

MiniMax M1 or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick MiniMax M1 for work measured by AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Shared results
1
MiniMax M1 only
28
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL only
15
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
MiniMax M1 not benchmarked, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 14.8 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: MiniMax M1 11.7 against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 26.5, 14.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
MiniMax M1 $2.20 against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL $0.50 per million output tokens, 4.4x apart.
Context window
MiniMax M1 takes 1M tokens, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMiniMax M1BarsNemotron 3.5 Super VLTies
Intelligence01
All shared boards01
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index4 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured65.5%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
SciCodeNot measured47.8%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LMArena Text: coding1359Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1359Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
AA Intelligence Index11.726.5Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench researchNot measured70.9%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench browserNot measured4.0%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured15.8%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured78.8%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured30.7%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1339Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: expert1317Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1353Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LMArena Text: math1361Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1363Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LMArena Text: science1354Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1355Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1337Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1319Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1172Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1148Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1110Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1127Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1154Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench designNot measured60.7%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured64.6%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured69.0%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LMArena Text1343Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1312Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1297Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: English1363Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1319Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1360Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: German1350Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1218Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1266Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: French1370Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1353Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1329Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1329Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1335Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1326Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1311Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1303Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

MiniMax M1$0.0015Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0004Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

MiniMax M1$0.027Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0090Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

MiniMax M1$0.102Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.035Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of MiniMax M1 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
SpecificationMiniMax M1NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
MakerMiniMaxNVIDIA
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJune 17, 2025October 15, 2026
Context window1M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.40$0.15
Output $/Mtok$2.20$0.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is MiniMax M1 better than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick MiniMax M1 for work measured by AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M1 or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

MiniMax M1 costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.20 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs $0.15 and $0.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, MiniMax M1 or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the MiniMax M1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. MiniMax M1's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next