Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MiniMax M1 vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B

Mistral Small 3.2 24B costs 7.3x less per output token than MiniMax M1 ($0.30 vs $2.20 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

MiniMax M1MiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.20
Mistral Small 3.2 24BMistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.30
vs $2.20 vs $0.30 per 1M output tokens. Mistral Small 3.2 24B is 7.3x cheaper.

MiniMax M1 or Mistral Small 3.2 24B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick MiniMax M1 for a larger context window (1M against 256K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. MiniMax M1 has results on LMArena Text: coding, LMArena Text: software and IT and AA Intelligence Index; Mistral Small 3.2 24B on Design Arena: websites, Design Arena: UI components and Design Arena: game dev. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
MiniMax M1 not benchmarked, Mistral Small 3.2 24B not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
MiniMax M1 $2.20 against Mistral Small 3.2 24B $0.30 per million output tokens, 7.3x apart.
Context window
MiniMax M1 takes 1M tokens, Mistral Small 3.2 24B 256K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index2 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Mistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
LMArena Text: coding1359Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1359Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Mistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
AA Intelligence Index11.7Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Mistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
LMArena Text: hard prompts1339Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: expert1317Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1353Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Math benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Mistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
LMArena Text: math1361Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1363Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Mistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
LMArena Text: science1354Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1355Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1337Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1319Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Mistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured896Only Mistral Small 3.2 24B measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured904Only Mistral Small 3.2 24B measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured889Only Mistral Small 3.2 24B measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured929Only Mistral Small 3.2 24B measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured907Only Mistral Small 3.2 24B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17 boards measured
General benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Mistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
LMArena Text1343Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1312Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1297Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: English1363Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1319Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1360Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: German1350Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1218Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1266Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: French1370Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1353Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1329Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1329Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1335Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1326Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1311Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1303Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

MiniMax M1$0.0015Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3.2 24B$0.0003Fits in one request

Mistral Small 3.2 24B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

MiniMax M1$0.027Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3.2 24B$0.0059Fits in one request

Mistral Small 3.2 24B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

MiniMax M1$0.102Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3.2 24B$0.023Fits in one request

Mistral Small 3.2 24B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of MiniMax M1 and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
SpecificationMiniMax M1Mistral Small 3.2 24B
MakerMiniMaxMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJune 17, 2025June 20, 2025
Context window1M256K
Input $/Mtok$0.40$0.10
Output $/Mtok$2.20$0.30
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is MiniMax M1 better than Mistral Small 3.2 24B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick MiniMax M1 for a larger context window (1M against 256K tokens).

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M1 or Mistral Small 3.2 24B?

MiniMax M1 costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.20 per million output tokens; Mistral Small 3.2 24B costs $0.10 and $0.30. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, MiniMax M1 or Mistral Small 3.2 24B?

MiniMax M1, with 1M tokens against 256K.

Has any benchmark tested both MiniMax M1 and Mistral Small 3.2 24B?

No benchmark has tested both yet. MiniMax M1 has results on LMArena Text: coding, LMArena Text: software and IT and AA Intelligence Index; Mistral Small 3.2 24B on Design Arena: websites, Design Arena: UI components and Design Arena: game dev. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 23, 2026.

Compare next