Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MiniMax M1 vs Mistral Small 3

MiniMax M1 leads Mistral Small 3 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 11.7 to 6.7, and Mistral Small 3 costs 27.5x less per output token ($0.08 vs $2.20 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 27 benchmarks have a result for both.

MiniMax M1MiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.20
27
Mistral Small 3Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.08
0
vs boards won of 27 shared

MiniMax M1 or Mistral Small 3: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick MiniMax M1 for a larger context window (1M against 33K tokens).

Shared results
27
MiniMax M1 only
2
Mistral Small 3 only
9
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
MiniMax M1 not benchmarked, Mistral Small 3 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Knowledge, 20.4 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: French: MiniMax M1 1370 against Mistral Small 3 1204, 27.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
MiniMax M1 $2.20 against Mistral Small 3 $0.08 per million output tokens, 27.5x apart.
Context window
MiniMax M1 takes 1M tokens, Mistral Small 3 33K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMiniMax M1BarsMistral Small 3Ties
Coding20
Intelligence10
Reasoning30
Math20
Knowledge40
General150
All shared boards270
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Mistral Small 3Leader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured25.2%Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: coding13591246MiniMax M1
LMArena Text: software and IT13591248MiniMax M1
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Mistral Small 3Leader
AA Intelligence Index11.76.7MiniMax M1
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Mistral Small 3Leader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured19.6%Only Mistral Small 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Reasoning benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Mistral Small 3Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured46.2%Only Mistral Small 3 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured3.8%Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13391233MiniMax M1
LMArena Text: expert13171202MiniMax M1
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13531243MiniMax M1
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Mistral Small 3Leader
AA Math IndexNot measured4.3Only Mistral Small 3 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured4.3%Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: math13611240MiniMax M1
LMArena Text: mathematical work13631243MiniMax M1
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Mistral Small 3Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured65.2%Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: science13541235MiniMax M1
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13551215MiniMax M1
LMArena Text: legal and government13371219MiniMax M1
LMArena Text: business and finance13191205MiniMax M1
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Mistral Small 3Leader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index150
General benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Mistral Small 3Leader
IFBenchNot measured26.4%Only Mistral Small 3 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured0.0%Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text13431234MiniMax M1
LMArena Text: instruction following13121214MiniMax M1
LMArena Text: creative writing12971194MiniMax M1
LMArena Text: English13631256MiniMax M1
LMArena Text: non-English13191198MiniMax M1
LMArena Text: Chinese13601204MiniMax M1
LMArena Text: German13501211MiniMax M1
LMArena Text: Japanese12171111MiniMax M1
LMArena Text: Korean12661188MiniMax M1
LMArena Text: French13701204MiniMax M1
LMArena Text: Spanish1353Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: Russian13291216MiniMax M1
LMArena Text: Polish1329Not measuredOnly MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn13351217MiniMax M1
LMArena Text: longer queries13261246MiniMax M1
LMArena Text: writing and language13111214MiniMax M1
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13031184MiniMax M1
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkMiniMax M1Mistral Small 3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

MiniMax M1$0.0015Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3$0.0001Fits in one request

Mistral Small 3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

MiniMax M1$0.027Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3$0.0027Exceeds the context window

Mistral Small 3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

MiniMax M1$0.102Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3$0.011Exceeds the context window

Mistral Small 3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of MiniMax M1 and Mistral Small 3
SpecificationMiniMax M1Mistral Small 3
MakerMiniMaxMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJune 17, 2025January 30, 2025
Context window1M33K
Input $/Mtok$0.40$0.05
Output $/Mtok$2.20$0.08
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is MiniMax M1 better than Mistral Small 3 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick MiniMax M1 for a larger context window (1M against 33K tokens).

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M1 or Mistral Small 3?

MiniMax M1 costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.20 per million output tokens; Mistral Small 3 costs $0.05 and $0.08. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, MiniMax M1 or Mistral Small 3?

MiniMax M1, with 1M tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks is the MiniMax M1 vs Mistral Small 3 comparison based on?

27 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. MiniMax M1's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Small 3's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next