Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MiniMax-01 vs Palmyra X5

MiniMax-01 costs 5.5x less per output token than Palmyra X5 ($1.10 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

MiniMax-01MiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.10
W Palmyra X5Writer
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$6.00
vs $1.10 vs $6.00 per 1M output tokens. MiniMax-01 is 5.5x cheaper.

MiniMax-01 or Palmyra X5: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick MiniMax-01 for output tokens 5.5x cheaper ($1.10 vs $6.00 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. MiniMax-01 has results on Kagi LLM Benchmark; Palmyra X5 has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
MiniMax-01 not benchmarked, Palmyra X5 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
MiniMax-01 $1.10 against Palmyra X5 $6.00 per million output tokens, 5.5x apart.
Context window
MiniMax-01 takes 1M tokens, Palmyra X5 1.04M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Reasoning benchmarks for MiniMax-01 and Palmyra X5
BenchmarkMiniMax-01Palmyra X5Leader
Kagi LLM Benchmark42.5%Not measuredOnly MiniMax-01 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

MiniMax-01$0.0008Fits in one request
Palmyra X5$0.0036Fits in one request

MiniMax-01 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

MiniMax-01$0.013Fits in one request
Palmyra X5$0.048Fits in one request

MiniMax-01 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

MiniMax-01$0.051Fits in one request
Palmyra X5$0.180Fits in one request

MiniMax-01 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of MiniMax-01 and Palmyra X5
SpecificationMiniMax-01Writer Palmyra X5
MakerMiniMaxWriter
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedJanuary 15, 2025January 21, 2026
Context window1M1.04M
Input $/Mtok$0.20$0.60
Output $/Mtok$1.10$6.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is MiniMax-01 better than Palmyra X5 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick MiniMax-01 for output tokens 5.5x cheaper ($1.10 vs $6.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, MiniMax-01 or Palmyra X5?

MiniMax-01 costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.10 per million output tokens; Palmyra X5 costs $0.60 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, MiniMax-01 or Palmyra X5?

Palmyra X5, with 1.04M tokens against 1M.

Has any benchmark tested both MiniMax-01 and Palmyra X5?

No benchmark has tested both yet. MiniMax-01 has results on Kagi LLM Benchmark; Palmyra X5 has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next