Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MiniMax-01 vs Relace Apply 3

MiniMax-01 and Relace Apply 3 cost about the same per output token ($1.10 vs $1.25 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

MiniMax-01MiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.10
Relace Apply 3Relace
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.25
vs $1.10 vs $1.25 per 1M output tokens. MiniMax-01 is 1.1x cheaper.

MiniMax-01 or Relace Apply 3: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick MiniMax-01 for output tokens 1.1x cheaper ($1.10 vs $1.25 per million) and a larger context window (1M against 256K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. MiniMax-01 has results on Kagi LLM Benchmark; Relace Apply 3 has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
MiniMax-01 not benchmarked, Relace Apply 3 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
MiniMax-01 $1.10 against Relace Apply 3 $1.25 per million output tokens, 1.1x apart.
Context window
MiniMax-01 takes 1M tokens, Relace Apply 3 256K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Reasoning benchmarks for MiniMax-01 and Relace Apply 3
BenchmarkMiniMax-01Relace Apply 3Leader
Kagi LLM Benchmark42.5%Not measuredOnly MiniMax-01 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

MiniMax-01$0.0008Fits in one request
Relace Apply 3$0.0015Fits in one request

MiniMax-01 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

MiniMax-01$0.013Fits in one request
Relace Apply 3$0.046Fits in one request

MiniMax-01 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

MiniMax-01$0.051Fits in one request
Relace Apply 3$0.182Fits in one request

MiniMax-01 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of MiniMax-01 and Relace Apply 3
SpecificationMiniMax-01Relace Apply 3
MakerMiniMaxRelace
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedJanuary 15, 2025September 26, 2025
Context window1M256K
Input $/Mtok$0.20$0.85
Output $/Mtok$1.10$1.25
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is MiniMax-01 better than Relace Apply 3 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick MiniMax-01 for output tokens 1.1x cheaper ($1.10 vs $1.25 per million) and a larger context window (1M against 256K tokens).

Which is cheaper, MiniMax-01 or Relace Apply 3?

MiniMax-01 costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.10 per million output tokens; Relace Apply 3 costs $0.85 and $1.25. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, MiniMax-01 or Relace Apply 3?

MiniMax-01, with 1M tokens against 256K.

Has any benchmark tested both MiniMax-01 and Relace Apply 3?

No benchmark has tested both yet. MiniMax-01 has results on Kagi LLM Benchmark; Relace Apply 3 has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next