MiniMax-01 vs Qwen3.8 Max Prime
MiniMax-01 costs 10.9x less per output token than Qwen3.8 Max Prime ($1.10 vs $12.00 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $1.10
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $12.00
MiniMax-01 or Qwen3.8 Max Prime: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick MiniMax-01 for output tokens 10.9x cheaper ($1.10 vs $12.00 per million) and a larger context window (1M against 1M tokens).
No benchmark has tested both yet. MiniMax-01 has results on Kagi LLM Benchmark; Qwen3.8 Max Prime has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Long documents
Listed context window
MiniMax-01
MiniMax-01 takes 1M tokens against 1M.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiniMax-01
MiniMax-01 $0.0008, Qwen3.8 Max Prime $0.010 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- MiniMax-01 not benchmarked, Qwen3.8 Max Prime not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
- Widest single gap
- None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
- Output price
- MiniMax-01 $1.10 against Qwen3.8 Max Prime $12.00 per million output tokens, 10.9x apart.
- Context window
- MiniMax-01 takes 1M tokens, Qwen3.8 Max Prime 1M.
Benchmark by benchmark
Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
| Benchmark | MiniMax-01 | Qwen3.8 Max Prime | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 42.5% | Not measured | Only MiniMax-01 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiniMax-01 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
MiniMax-01 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
MiniMax-01 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | MiniMax-01 | Qwen3.8 Max Prime |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | MiniMax | Qwen |
| Weights | Open weights | No public weights listed |
| Released | January 15, 2025 | September 23, 2026 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.20 | $4.00 |
| Output $/Mtok | $1.10 | $12.00 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is MiniMax-01 better than Qwen3.8 Max Prime for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick MiniMax-01 for output tokens 10.9x cheaper ($1.10 vs $12.00 per million) and a larger context window (1M against 1M tokens).
Which is cheaper, MiniMax-01 or Qwen3.8 Max Prime?
MiniMax-01 costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.10 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 Max Prime costs $4.00 and $12.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, MiniMax-01 or Qwen3.8 Max Prime?
MiniMax-01, with 1M tokens against 1M.
Has any benchmark tested both MiniMax-01 and Qwen3.8 Max Prime?
No benchmark has tested both yet. MiniMax-01 has results on Kagi LLM Benchmark; Qwen3.8 Max Prime has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 23, 2026.