Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor costs 4.3x less per output token than Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 ($0.20 vs $0.85 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorMeta
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
S Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2Sao10K
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.85
vs $0.20 vs $0.85 per 1M output tokens. Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor is 4.3x cheaper.

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor or Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor for output tokens 4.3x cheaper ($0.20 vs $0.85 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 131K tokens).

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor not benchmarked, Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor $0.20 against Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 $0.85 per million output tokens, 4.3x apart.
Context window
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor takes 1.05M tokens, Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor$0.0002Fits in one request
Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2$0.0013Fits in one request

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor$0.0056Fits in one request
Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2$0.045Fits in one request

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor$0.022Fits in one request
Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2$0.178Exceeds the context window

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor and Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
SpecificationMeta Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorSao10K Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
MakerMetaSao10K
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 2, 2026August 28, 2024
Context window1.05M131K
Input $/Mtok$0.10$0.85
Output $/Mtok$0.20$0.85
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor better than Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor for output tokens 4.3x cheaper ($0.20 vs $0.85 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 131K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor or Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2?

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 costs $0.85 and $0.85. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor or Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2?

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

Has any benchmark tested both Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor and Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2?

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next