Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor vs Palmyra X5
Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor costs 30.0x less per output token than Palmyra X5 ($0.20 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $0.20
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $6.00
Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor or Palmyra X5: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor for output tokens 30.0x cheaper ($0.20 vs $6.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1.04M tokens).
No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor
Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor takes 1.05M tokens against 1.04M.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor
Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor $0.0002, Palmyra X5 $0.0036 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor not benchmarked, Palmyra X5 not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
- Widest single gap
- None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
- Output price
- Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor $0.20 against Palmyra X5 $6.00 per million output tokens, 30.0x apart.
- Context window
- Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor takes 1.05M tokens, Palmyra X5 1.04M.
Benchmark by benchmark
Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Meta Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor | Writer Palmyra X5 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Meta | Writer |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | August 21, 2026 | January 21, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.04M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.10 | $0.60 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.20 | $6.00 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor better than Palmyra X5 for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor for output tokens 30.0x cheaper ($0.20 vs $6.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1.04M tokens).
Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor or Palmyra X5?
Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Palmyra X5 costs $0.60 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor or Palmyra X5?
Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor, with 1.05M tokens against 1.04M.
Has any benchmark tested both Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor and Palmyra X5?
No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them. Data as of October 22, 2026.