Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.8 Flash

Qwen3.8 Flash costs 2.9x less per output token than Muse Glimmer 30B ($0.47 vs $1.35 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Muse Glimmer 30BMeta
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.35
Qwen3.8 FlashQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.47
vs $1.35 vs $0.47 per 1M output tokens. Qwen3.8 Flash is 2.9x cheaper.

Muse Glimmer 30B or Qwen3.8 Flash: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. Muse Glimmer 30B has results on AA Coding Index, ALE-Bench and AA Intelligence Index; Qwen3.8 Flash on LiveBench coding, LiveBench research and LiveBench browser. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Muse Glimmer 30B not benchmarked, Qwen3.8 Flash not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Muse Glimmer 30B $1.35 against Qwen3.8 Flash $0.47 per million output tokens, 2.9x apart.
Context window
Muse Glimmer 30B takes 131K tokens, Qwen3.8 Flash 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index3 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Qwen3.8 Flash
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BQwen3.8 FlashLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured87.4%Only Qwen3.8 Flash measured
AA Coding Index49.0Not measuredOnly Muse Glimmer 30B measured
ALE-Bench962.5Not measuredOnly Muse Glimmer 30B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Qwen3.8 Flash
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BQwen3.8 FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index17.5Not measuredOnly Muse Glimmer 30B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Qwen3.8 Flash
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BQwen3.8 FlashLeader
AA Agentic Index8.5Not measuredOnly Muse Glimmer 30B measured
LiveBench researchNot measured74.6%Only Qwen3.8 Flash measured
LiveBench browserNot measured48.0%Only Qwen3.8 Flash measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured37.1%Only Qwen3.8 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Qwen3.8 Flash
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BQwen3.8 FlashLeader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured87.4%Only Qwen3.8 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Qwen3.8 Flash
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BQwen3.8 FlashLeader
Design Arena: game dev1144Not measuredOnly Muse Glimmer 30B measured
LiveBench designNot measured72.8%Only Qwen3.8 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
General benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Qwen3.8 Flash
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BQwen3.8 FlashLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured74.2%Only Qwen3.8 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 45 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Muse Glimmer 30B$0.0010Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Flash$0.0004Fits in one request

Qwen3.8 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Muse Glimmer 30B$0.020Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Flash$0.0089Fits in one request

Qwen3.8 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Muse Glimmer 30B$0.079Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.8 Flash$0.035Fits in one request

Qwen3.8 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Muse Glimmer 30B and Qwen3.8 Flash
SpecificationMeta Muse Glimmer 30BQwen3.8 Flash
MakerMetaQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 9, 2026August 26, 2026
Context window131K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.325$0.15
Output $/Mtok$1.35$0.47
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Muse Glimmer 30B better than Qwen3.8 Flash for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Muse Glimmer 30B or Qwen3.8 Flash?

Muse Glimmer 30B costs $0.325 per million input tokens and $1.35 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 Flash costs $0.15 and $0.47. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Glimmer 30B or Qwen3.8 Flash?

Qwen3.8 Flash, with 1M tokens against 131K.

Has any benchmark tested both Muse Glimmer 30B and Qwen3.8 Flash?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Muse Glimmer 30B has results on AA Coding Index, ALE-Bench and AA Intelligence Index; Qwen3.8 Flash on LiveBench coding, LiveBench research and LiveBench browser. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next