Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Muse Glimmer 30B vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B

Mistral Small 3.2 24B costs 4.5x less per output token than Muse Glimmer 30B ($0.30 vs $1.35 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 1 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace Muse Glimmer 30B Replace Mistral Small 3.2 24B
Muse Glimmer 30BMeta
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.35
1
Mistral Small 3.2 24BMistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.30
0
vs boards won of 1 shared

Muse Glimmer 30B or Mistral Small 3.2 24B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Model AMuse Glimmer 30BMetaNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BMistral Small 3.2 24BMistral AINot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task
Shared results
1
Muse Glimmer 30B only
4
Mistral Small 3.2 24B only
4
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Muse Glimmer 30B not benchmarked, Mistral Small 3.2 24B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 31.9 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: game dev: Muse Glimmer 30B 1144 against Mistral Small 3.2 24B 889, 31.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Muse Glimmer 30B $1.35 against Mistral Small 3.2 24B $0.30 per million output tokens, 4.5x apart.
Context window
Muse Glimmer 30B takes 131K tokens, Mistral Small 3.2 24B 256K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMuse Glimmer 30BBarsMistral Small 3.2 24BTies
Web design10
All shared boards10
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index2 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BMistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
AA Coding Index49.0Not measuredOnly Muse Glimmer 30B measured
ALE-Bench962.5Not measuredOnly Muse Glimmer 30B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BMistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
AA Intelligence Index17.5Not measuredOnly Muse Glimmer 30B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BMistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
AA Agentic Index8.5Not measuredOnly Muse Glimmer 30B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BMistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
Neither model has a result on 22 boards here
MathNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BMistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
Neither model has a result on 13 boards here
KnowledgeNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BMistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
Neither model has a result on 18 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Web design benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BMistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured896Only Mistral Small 3.2 24B measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured907Only Mistral Small 3.2 24B measured
Design Arena: game dev1144889Muse Glimmer 30B
Design Arena: data vizNot measured929Only Mistral Small 3.2 24B measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured907Only Mistral Small 3.2 24B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
GeneralNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BMistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
Neither model has a result on 46 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BMistral Small 3.2 24BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Muse Glimmer 30B$0.0010Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3.2 24B$0.0003Fits in one request

Mistral Small 3.2 24B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Muse Glimmer 30B$0.020Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3.2 24B$0.0059Fits in one request

Mistral Small 3.2 24B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Muse Glimmer 30B$0.079Exceeds the context window
Mistral Small 3.2 24B$0.023Fits in one request

Mistral Small 3.2 24B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Muse Glimmer 30B and Mistral Small 3.2 24B
SpecificationMeta Muse Glimmer 30BMistral Small 3.2 24B
MakerMetaMistral AI
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 9, 2026June 20, 2025
Context window131K256K
Input $/Mtok$0.325$0.10
Output $/Mtok$1.35$0.30
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Muse Glimmer 30B better than Mistral Small 3.2 24B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Muse Glimmer 30B or Mistral Small 3.2 24B?

Muse Glimmer 30B costs $0.325 per million input tokens and $1.35 per million output tokens; Mistral Small 3.2 24B costs $0.10 and $0.30. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Glimmer 30B or Mistral Small 3.2 24B?

Mistral Small 3.2 24B, with 256K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Muse Glimmer 30B vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Muse Glimmer 30B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Small 3.2 24B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next