Muse Glimmer 30B vs Mistral Small 4
Muse Glimmer 30B leads Mistral Small 4 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 17.5 to 11.3, and Mistral Small 4 costs 2.3x less per output token ($0.60 vs $1.35 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 4 benchmarks have a result for both.
Muse Glimmer 30B or Mistral Small 4: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Compare them on price, context and the boards below.
- Shared results
- 4
- Muse Glimmer 30B only
- 1
- Mistral Small 4 only
- 11
- Like-for-like categories
- 3 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Muse Glimmer 30B
Muse Glimmer 30B leads, 17.5 against 11.3.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
Muse Glimmer 30B
Muse Glimmer 30B leads, 8.5 against 0.8.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Mistral Small 4
Mistral Small 4 takes 262K tokens against 131K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Mistral Small 4
Muse Glimmer 30B $0.0010, Mistral Small 4 $0.0004 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Muse Glimmer 30B not benchmarked, Mistral Small 4 not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Coding, 18.9 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- AA Coding Index: Muse Glimmer 30B 49.0 against Mistral Small 4 26.6, 22.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Muse Glimmer 30B $1.35 against Mistral Small 4 $0.60 per million output tokens, 2.3x apart.
- Context window
- Muse Glimmer 30B takes 131K tokens, Mistral Small 4 262K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Muse Glimmer 30B | Bars | Mistral Small 4 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 2 | 0 | ||
| Intelligence | 1 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 1 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 4 | 0 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer 30B | Mistral Small 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Coding Index | 49.0 | 26.6 | Muse Glimmer 30B |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.0% | Only Mistral Small 4 measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 38.8% | Only Mistral Small 4 measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 17.4% | Only Mistral Small 4 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 962.5 | 497.6 | Muse Glimmer 30B |
| Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer 30B | Mistral Small 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 17.5 | 11.3 | Muse Glimmer 30B |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer 30B | Mistral Small 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 8.5 | 0.8 | Muse Glimmer 30B |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 41.2% | Only Mistral Small 4 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here | |||
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer 30B | Mistral Small 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 76.9% | Only Mistral Small 4 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 9.9% | Only Mistral Small 4 measured |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | Not measured | 40.5% | Only Mistral Small 4 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here | |||
MathNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer 30B | Mistral Small 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 13 boards here | |||
KnowledgeNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer 30B | Mistral Small 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 18 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer 30B | Mistral Small 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: game dev | 1144 | Not measured | Only Muse Glimmer 30B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer 30B | Mistral Small 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | Not measured | 48.2% | Only Mistral Small 4 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | Not measured | 49.7% | Only Mistral Small 4 measured |
| DTBench | Not measured | 70.9% | Only Mistral Small 4 measured |
| LMCA | Not measured | 20.6% | Only Mistral Small 4 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 42 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer 30B | Mistral Small 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Mistral Small 4 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Mistral Small 4 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Mistral Small 4 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Meta Muse Glimmer 30B | Mistral Small 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Meta | Mistral AI |
| Weights | Open weights | Open weights |
| Released | August 9, 2026 | March 16, 2026 |
| Context window | 131K | 262K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.325 | $0.15 |
| Output $/Mtok | $1.35 | $0.60 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 1 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Muse Glimmer 30B better than Mistral Small 4 for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.
Which is cheaper, Muse Glimmer 30B or Mistral Small 4?
Muse Glimmer 30B costs $0.325 per million input tokens and $1.35 per million output tokens; Mistral Small 4 costs $0.15 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Muse Glimmer 30B or Mistral Small 4?
Mistral Small 4, with 262K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks is the Muse Glimmer 30B vs Mistral Small 4 comparison based on?
4 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Muse Glimmer 30B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Small 4's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.