Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Muse Glimmer 30B vs Mistral Small 3

Muse Glimmer 30B leads Mistral Small 3 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 17.5 to 6.7, and Mistral Small 3 costs 16.9x less per output token ($0.08 vs $1.35 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 1 benchmarks have a result for both.

Muse Glimmer 30BMeta
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.35
1
Mistral Small 3Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.08
0
vs boards won of 1 shared

Muse Glimmer 30B or Mistral Small 3: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Muse Glimmer 30B for a larger context window (131K against 33K tokens).

Shared results
1
Muse Glimmer 30B only
4
Mistral Small 3 only
35
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Muse Glimmer 30B not benchmarked, Mistral Small 3 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 10.8 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: Muse Glimmer 30B 17.5 against Mistral Small 3 6.7, 10.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Muse Glimmer 30B $1.35 against Mistral Small 3 $0.08 per million output tokens, 16.9x apart.
Context window
Muse Glimmer 30B takes 131K tokens, Mistral Small 3 33K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMuse Glimmer 30BBarsMistral Small 3Ties
Intelligence10
All shared boards10
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index5 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BMistral Small 3Leader
AA Coding Index49.0Not measuredOnly Muse Glimmer 30B measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured25.2%Only Mistral Small 3 measured
ALE-Bench962.5Not measuredOnly Muse Glimmer 30B measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1246Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1248Only Mistral Small 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BMistral Small 3Leader
AA Intelligence Index17.56.7Muse Glimmer 30B
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BMistral Small 3Leader
AA Agentic Index8.5Not measuredOnly Muse Glimmer 30B measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured19.6%Only Mistral Small 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BMistral Small 3Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured46.2%Only Mistral Small 3 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured3.8%Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1233Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1202Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1243Only Mistral Small 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BMistral Small 3Leader
AA Math IndexNot measured4.3Only Mistral Small 3 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured4.3%Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1240Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1243Only Mistral Small 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BMistral Small 3Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured65.2%Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1235Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1215Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1219Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1205Only Mistral Small 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BMistral Small 3Leader
Design Arena: game dev1131Not measuredOnly Muse Glimmer 30B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BMistral Small 3Leader
IFBenchNot measured26.4%Only Mistral Small 3 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured0.0%Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1234Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1214Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1194Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1256Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1198Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1204Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1211Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1111Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1188Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1204Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1216Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1217Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1246Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1214Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1184Only Mistral Small 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BMistral Small 3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Muse Glimmer 30B$0.0010Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3$0.0001Fits in one request

Mistral Small 3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Muse Glimmer 30B$0.020Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3$0.0027Exceeds the context window

Mistral Small 3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Muse Glimmer 30B$0.079Exceeds the context window
Mistral Small 3$0.011Exceeds the context window

Mistral Small 3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Muse Glimmer 30B and Mistral Small 3
SpecificationMeta Muse Glimmer 30BMistral Small 3
MakerMetaMistral AI
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 9, 2026January 30, 2025
Context window131K33K
Input $/Mtok$0.325$0.05
Output $/Mtok$1.35$0.08
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Muse Glimmer 30B better than Mistral Small 3 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Muse Glimmer 30B for a larger context window (131K against 33K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Muse Glimmer 30B or Mistral Small 3?

Muse Glimmer 30B costs $0.325 per million input tokens and $1.35 per million output tokens; Mistral Small 3 costs $0.05 and $0.08. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Glimmer 30B or Mistral Small 3?

Muse Glimmer 30B, with 131K tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks is the Muse Glimmer 30B vs Mistral Small 3 comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Muse Glimmer 30B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Small 3's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next