Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Muse Glimmer 30B vs MiniMax M2-her

Muse Glimmer 30B and MiniMax M2-her cost about the same per output token ($1.35 vs $1.20 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Replace Muse Glimmer 30B Replace MiniMax M2-her
Muse Glimmer 30BMeta
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.35
MiniMax M2-herMiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.20
vs $1.35 vs $1.20 per 1M output tokens. MiniMax M2-her is 1.1x cheaper.

Muse Glimmer 30B or MiniMax M2-her: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Muse Glimmer 30B for a larger context window (131K against 66K tokens).

Model AMuse Glimmer 30BMetaNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BMiniMax M2-herMiniMaxNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task

No benchmark has tested both yet. Muse Glimmer 30B has results on AA Coding Index, ALE-Bench and AA Intelligence Index; MiniMax M2-her has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Muse Glimmer 30B not benchmarked, MiniMax M2-her not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Muse Glimmer 30B $1.35 against MiniMax M2-her $1.20 per million output tokens, 1.1x apart.
Context window
Muse Glimmer 30B takes 131K tokens, MiniMax M2-her 66K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index2 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and MiniMax M2-her
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BMiniMax M2-herLeader
AA Coding Index49.0Not measuredOnly Muse Glimmer 30B measured
ALE-Bench962.5Not measuredOnly Muse Glimmer 30B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and MiniMax M2-her
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BMiniMax M2-herLeader
AA Intelligence Index17.5Not measuredOnly Muse Glimmer 30B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and MiniMax M2-her
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BMiniMax M2-herLeader
AA Agentic Index8.5Not measuredOnly Muse Glimmer 30B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Web design benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and MiniMax M2-her
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BMiniMax M2-herLeader
Design Arena: game dev1132Not measuredOnly Muse Glimmer 30B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Muse Glimmer 30B$0.0010Fits in one request
MiniMax M2-her$0.0009Fits in one request

MiniMax M2-her costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Muse Glimmer 30B$0.020Fits in one request
MiniMax M2-her$0.019Fits in one request

MiniMax M2-her costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Muse Glimmer 30B$0.079Exceeds the context window
MiniMax M2-her$0.072Exceeds the context window

MiniMax M2-her costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Muse Glimmer 30B and MiniMax M2-her
SpecificationMeta Muse Glimmer 30BMiniMax M2-her
MakerMetaMiniMax
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 9, 2026January 23, 2026
Context window131K66K
Input $/Mtok$0.325$0.30
Output $/Mtok$1.35$1.20
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Muse Glimmer 30B better than MiniMax M2-her for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Muse Glimmer 30B for a larger context window (131K against 66K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Muse Glimmer 30B or MiniMax M2-her?

Muse Glimmer 30B costs $0.325 per million input tokens and $1.35 per million output tokens; MiniMax M2-her costs $0.30 and $1.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Glimmer 30B or MiniMax M2-her?

Muse Glimmer 30B, with 131K tokens against 66K.

Has any benchmark tested both Muse Glimmer 30B and MiniMax M2-her?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Muse Glimmer 30B has results on AA Coding Index, ALE-Bench and AA Intelligence Index; MiniMax M2-her has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next