LongCat 2.0 vs Morph V3 Fast
Updated October 21, 2026. 0 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- 19.1
- Output $/M
- $1.20
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $1.20
Decision reading
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
LongCat 2.0 has the edge where the context window is larger, 1.05M against 262K tokens.
- Shared results
- 0
- LongCat 2.0 only
- 8
- Morph V3 Fast only
- 0
- Like-for-like categories
- 0 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only LongCat 2.0 has a AA Intelligence Index result, 19.1.
Directional only
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only LongCat 2.0 has a AA Agentic Index result, 14.0.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
LongCat 2.0
LongCat 2.0 takes 1.05M tokens against 262K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
LongCat 2.0
LongCat 2.0 $0.0009, Morph V3 Fast $0.0014 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- LongCat 2.0 not benchmarked, Morph V3 Fast not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- No category has a result for both models.
- Widest single gap
- No benchmark has a result for both models.
- Output price
- Both cost $1.20 per million output tokens.
- Context window
- LongCat 2.0 takes 1.05M tokens, Morph V3 Fast 262K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index3 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | LongCat 2.0 | Morph V3 Fast | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Coding Index | 45.3 | Not measured | Only LongCat 2.0 measured |
| SciCode | 36.3% | Not measured | Only LongCat 2.0 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 793.5 | Not measured | Only LongCat 2.0 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here | |||
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
| Benchmark | LongCat 2.0 | Morph V3 Fast | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 19.1 | Not measured | Only LongCat 2.0 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
| Benchmark | LongCat 2.0 | Morph V3 Fast | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 14.0 | Not measured | Only LongCat 2.0 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here | |||
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | LongCat 2.0 | Morph V3 Fast | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 78.0% | Not measured | Only LongCat 2.0 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 33.7% | Not measured | Only LongCat 2.0 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here | |||
MathNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | LongCat 2.0 | Morph V3 Fast | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 13 boards here | |||
KnowledgeNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | LongCat 2.0 | Morph V3 Fast | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 17 boards here | |||
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | LongCat 2.0 | Morph V3 Fast | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 9 boards here | |||
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
| Benchmark | LongCat 2.0 | Morph V3 Fast | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 65.0% | Not measured | Only LongCat 2.0 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 45 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | LongCat 2.0 | Morph V3 Fast | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
LongCat 2.0 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
LongCat 2.0 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
LongCat 2.0 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Meituan LongCat 2.0 | Morph V3 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Meituan | Morph |
| Weights | Open weights | No public weights listed |
| Released | July 20, 2026 | July 7, 2025 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 262K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.30 | $0.80 |
| Output $/Mtok | $1.20 | $1.20 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is LongCat 2.0 better than Morph V3 Fast for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. LongCat 2.0 has the edge where the context window is larger, 1.05M against 262K tokens.
Which is cheaper, LongCat 2.0 or Morph V3 Fast?
LongCat 2.0 costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Morph V3 Fast costs $0.80 and $1.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, LongCat 2.0 or Morph V3 Fast?
LongCat 2.0, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks is the LongCat 2.0 vs Morph V3 Fast comparison based on?
0 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. LongCat 2.0's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Morph V3 Fast's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.