Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Weaver (alpha) vs Free Models Router

Updated October 21, 2026. 0 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

M Weaver (alpha)Mancer
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.75
Free Models RouterOpenRouter
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
No data
vs 8K vs 200K context window. Free Models Router fits 25.0x more.

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
0
Weaver (alpha) only
0
Free Models Router only
0
Like-for-like categories
0 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Weaver (alpha) not benchmarked, Free Models Router not benchmarked.
Widest category
No category has a result for both models.
Widest single gap
No benchmark has a result for both models.
Output price
Weaver (alpha) $0.75 against Free Models Router Free per million output tokens.
Context window
Weaver (alpha) takes 8K tokens, Free Models Router 200K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

CodingNot comparableSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index0 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Weaver (alpha) and Free Models Router
BenchmarkWeaver (alpha)Free Models RouterLeader
Neither model has a result on 38 boards here
IntelligenceNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Weaver (alpha) and Free Models Router
BenchmarkWeaver (alpha)Free Models RouterLeader
Neither model has a result on 2 boards here
Agentic workNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Weaver (alpha) and Free Models Router
BenchmarkWeaver (alpha)Free Models RouterLeader
Neither model has a result on 39 boards here
ReasoningNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Weaver (alpha) and Free Models Router
BenchmarkWeaver (alpha)Free Models RouterLeader
Neither model has a result on 21 boards here
MathNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Weaver (alpha) and Free Models Router
BenchmarkWeaver (alpha)Free Models RouterLeader
Neither model has a result on 13 boards here
KnowledgeNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Weaver (alpha) and Free Models Router
BenchmarkWeaver (alpha)Free Models RouterLeader
Neither model has a result on 17 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Weaver (alpha) and Free Models Router
BenchmarkWeaver (alpha)Free Models RouterLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Weaver (alpha) and Free Models Router
BenchmarkWeaver (alpha)Free Models RouterLeader
Neither model has a result on 46 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Weaver (alpha) and Free Models Router
BenchmarkWeaver (alpha)Free Models RouterLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Weaver (alpha)$0.0008Fits in one request
Free Models Router$0.0000Fits in one request

Free Models Router costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Weaver (alpha)$0.022Exceeds the context window
Free Models Router$0.0000Fits in one request

Free Models Router costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Weaver (alpha)$0.087Exceeds the context window
Free Models Router$0.0000Exceeds the context window

Free Models Router costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Weaver (alpha) and Free Models Router
SpecificationMancer Weaver (alpha)Free Models Router
MakerMancerOpenRouter
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 2, 2023February 1, 2026
Context window8K200K
Input $/Mtok$0.40Free
Output $/Mtok$0.75Free
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Weaver (alpha) better than Free Models Router for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Weaver (alpha) or Free Models Router?

Weaver (alpha) costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $0.75 per million output tokens; Free Models Router costs Free and Free. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Weaver (alpha) or Free Models Router?

Free Models Router, with 200K tokens against 8K.

How many benchmarks is the Weaver (alpha) vs Free Models Router comparison based on?

0 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Weaver (alpha)'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Free Models Router's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next