Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Weaver (alpha) vs MiniMax-01

Weaver (alpha) costs 1.5x less per output token than MiniMax-01 ($0.75 vs $1.10 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

M Weaver (alpha)Mancer
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.75
MiniMax-01MiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.10
vs $0.75 vs $1.10 per 1M output tokens. Weaver (alpha) is 1.5x cheaper.

Weaver (alpha) or MiniMax-01: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Weaver (alpha) for output tokens 1.5x cheaper ($0.75 vs $1.10 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Weaver (alpha) has none yet; MiniMax-01 on Kagi LLM Benchmark. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Weaver (alpha) not benchmarked, MiniMax-01 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Weaver (alpha) $0.75 against MiniMax-01 $1.10 per million output tokens, 1.5x apart.
Context window
Weaver (alpha) takes 8K tokens, MiniMax-01 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Weaver (alpha) and MiniMax-01
BenchmarkWeaver (alpha)MiniMax-01Leader
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured42.5%Only MiniMax-01 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Weaver (alpha)$0.0008Fits in one request
MiniMax-01$0.0008Fits in one request

MiniMax-01 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Weaver (alpha)$0.022Exceeds the context window
MiniMax-01$0.013Fits in one request

MiniMax-01 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Weaver (alpha)$0.087Exceeds the context window
MiniMax-01$0.051Fits in one request

MiniMax-01 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Weaver (alpha) and MiniMax-01
SpecificationMancer Weaver (alpha)MiniMax-01
MakerMancerMiniMax
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 2, 2023January 15, 2025
Context window8K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.40$0.20
Output $/Mtok$0.75$1.10
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Weaver (alpha) better than MiniMax-01 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Weaver (alpha) for output tokens 1.5x cheaper ($0.75 vs $1.10 per million).

Which is cheaper, Weaver (alpha) or MiniMax-01?

Weaver (alpha) costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $0.75 per million output tokens; MiniMax-01 costs $0.20 and $1.10. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Weaver (alpha) or MiniMax-01?

MiniMax-01, with 1M tokens against 8K.

Has any benchmark tested both Weaver (alpha) and MiniMax-01?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Weaver (alpha) has none yet; MiniMax-01 on Kagi LLM Benchmark. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next