Lyria 3 Pro Preview vs Llama 3 8B Lunaris
Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- No data
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $0.05
Lyria 3 Pro Preview or Llama 3 8B Lunaris: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Lyria 3 Pro Preview for a larger context window (1.05M against 8K tokens).
No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Lyria 3 Pro Preview
Lyria 3 Pro Preview takes 1.05M tokens against 8K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Lyria 3 Pro Preview
Lyria 3 Pro Preview $0.0000, Llama 3 8B Lunaris $0.0001 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Lyria 3 Pro Preview not benchmarked, Llama 3 8B Lunaris not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
- Widest single gap
- None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
- Output price
- Lyria 3 Pro Preview Free against Llama 3 8B Lunaris $0.05 per million output tokens.
- Context window
- Lyria 3 Pro Preview takes 1.05M tokens, Llama 3 8B Lunaris 8K.
Benchmark by benchmark
Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Lyria 3 Pro Preview costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Lyria 3 Pro Preview costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Lyria 3 Pro Preview costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Google Lyria 3 Pro Preview | Sao10K Llama 3 8B Lunaris |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Sao10K | |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | March 30, 2026 | August 13, 2024 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 8K |
| Input $/Mtok | Free | $0.04 |
| Output $/Mtok | Free | $0.05 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Lyria 3 Pro Preview better than Llama 3 8B Lunaris for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Lyria 3 Pro Preview for a larger context window (1.05M against 8K tokens).
Which is cheaper, Lyria 3 Pro Preview or Llama 3 8B Lunaris?
Lyria 3 Pro Preview costs Free per million input tokens and Free per million output tokens; Llama 3 8B Lunaris costs $0.04 and $0.05. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Lyria 3 Pro Preview or Llama 3 8B Lunaris?
Lyria 3 Pro Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 8K.
Has any benchmark tested both Lyria 3 Pro Preview and Llama 3 8B Lunaris?
No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them. Data as of October 22, 2026.