Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Llama Guard 4 12B costs 2.6x less per output token than Qwen3.8 Omni Flash ($0.18 vs $0.47 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Replace Llama Guard 4 12B Replace Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Llama Guard 4 12BMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.18
Qwen3.8 Omni FlashQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.47
vs $0.18 vs $0.47 per 1M output tokens. Llama Guard 4 12B is 2.6x cheaper.

Llama Guard 4 12B or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama Guard 4 12B for output tokens 2.6x cheaper ($0.18 vs $0.47 per million).

Model ALlama Guard 4 12BMeta LlamaNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BQwen3.8 Omni FlashQwenNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama Guard 4 12B not benchmarked, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Llama Guard 4 12B $0.18 against Qwen3.8 Omni Flash $0.47 per million output tokens, 2.6x apart.
Context window
Llama Guard 4 12B takes 164K tokens, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama Guard 4 12B$0.0003Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash$0.0004Fits in one request

Llama Guard 4 12B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama Guard 4 12B$0.0095Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash$0.0089Fits in one request

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama Guard 4 12B$0.038Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash$0.035Fits in one request

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama Guard 4 12B and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
SpecificationMeta Llama Guard 4 12BQwen3.8 Omni Flash
MakerMeta LlamaQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 30, 2025September 21, 2026
Context window164K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.18$0.15
Output $/Mtok$0.18$0.47
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama Guard 4 12B better than Qwen3.8 Omni Flash for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama Guard 4 12B for output tokens 2.6x cheaper ($0.18 vs $0.47 per million).

Which is cheaper, Llama Guard 4 12B or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

Llama Guard 4 12B costs $0.18 per million input tokens and $0.18 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 Omni Flash costs $0.15 and $0.47. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama Guard 4 12B or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash, with 1M tokens against 164K.

Has any benchmark tested both Llama Guard 4 12B and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next