Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama Guard 4 12B vs Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Llama Guard 4 12B costs 5.6x less per output token than Hermes 3 405B Instruct ($0.18 vs $1.00 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Llama Guard 4 12BMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.18
N Hermes 3 405B InstructNous Research
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.00
vs $0.18 vs $1.00 per 1M output tokens. Llama Guard 4 12B is 5.6x cheaper.

Llama Guard 4 12B or Hermes 3 405B Instruct: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama Guard 4 12B for output tokens 5.6x cheaper ($0.18 vs $1.00 per million) and a larger context window (164K against 131K tokens).

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama Guard 4 12B not benchmarked, Hermes 3 405B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Llama Guard 4 12B $0.18 against Hermes 3 405B Instruct $1.00 per million output tokens, 5.6x apart.
Context window
Llama Guard 4 12B takes 164K tokens, Hermes 3 405B Instruct 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama Guard 4 12B$0.0003Fits in one request
Hermes 3 405B Instruct$0.0015Fits in one request

Llama Guard 4 12B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama Guard 4 12B$0.0095Fits in one request
Hermes 3 405B Instruct$0.053Fits in one request

Llama Guard 4 12B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama Guard 4 12B$0.038Exceeds the context window
Hermes 3 405B Instruct$0.210Exceeds the context window

Llama Guard 4 12B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama Guard 4 12B and Hermes 3 405B Instruct
SpecificationMeta Llama Guard 4 12BNous Hermes 3 405B Instruct
MakerMeta LlamaNous Research
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedApril 30, 2025August 16, 2024
Context window164K131K
Input $/Mtok$0.18$1.00
Output $/Mtok$0.18$1.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama Guard 4 12B better than Hermes 3 405B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama Guard 4 12B for output tokens 5.6x cheaper ($0.18 vs $1.00 per million) and a larger context window (164K against 131K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Llama Guard 4 12B or Hermes 3 405B Instruct?

Llama Guard 4 12B costs $0.18 per million input tokens and $0.18 per million output tokens; Hermes 3 405B Instruct costs $1.00 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama Guard 4 12B or Hermes 3 405B Instruct?

Llama Guard 4 12B, with 164K tokens against 131K.

Has any benchmark tested both Llama Guard 4 12B and Hermes 3 405B Instruct?

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them. Data as of October 23, 2026.

Compare next