Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 leads Llama 3.2 3B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 12.0 to 5.7, and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs 2.3x less per output token ($0.3325 vs $0.775 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 11 benchmarks have a result for both.

Llama 3.2 3B InstructMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.3325
0
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.775
11
vs boards won of 11 shared

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 3.2 3B Instruct for output tokens 2.3x cheaper ($0.3325 vs $0.775 per million) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Shared results
11
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct only
24
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 only
13
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct not benchmarked, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 87.7 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AA Math Index: Llama 3.2 3B Instruct 3.3 against Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 91.0, 87.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct $0.3325 against Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 $0.775 per million output tokens, 2.3x apart.
Context window
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct takes 131K tokens, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryLlama 3.2 3B InstructBarsQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Ties
Coding01
Intelligence01
Agentic work02
Reasoning02
Math02
Knowledge01
General02
All shared boards011
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)8.3%78.8%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
SciCodeNot measured41.4%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured15.2%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
WeirdMLNot measured38.7%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: coding1098Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1103Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
AA Intelligence Index5.712.0Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Agentic work benchmarks for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom21.1%53.2%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BALROG10.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)21.9%52.1%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)25.5%79.0%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)5.3%15.9%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
ARC-AGINot measured11.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured1.3%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1095Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: expert1090Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1141Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
AA Math Index3.391.0Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)3.3%91.0%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: math1126Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1128Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)34.7%84.3%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: science1106Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1104Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1115Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1074Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1058Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured963Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured951Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1070Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured994Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1038Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
General benchmarks for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
IFBench26.2%51.2%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)4.3%72.0%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
DTBenchNot measured78.4%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
LMCANot measured23.5%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text1110Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1089Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1094Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: English1180Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: non-English1019Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1017Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: German1056Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Russian949Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1105Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1100Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1096Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1083Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct$0.0002Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.0005Fits in one request

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct$0.0035Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.0096Fits in one request

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct$0.013Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.037Fits in one request

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
SpecificationMeta Llama 3.2 3B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
MakerMeta LlamaQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 25, 2024July 21, 2025
Context window131K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.0505$0.145
Output $/Mtok$0.3325$0.775
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama 3.2 3B Instruct better than Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 3.2 3B Instruct for output tokens 2.3x cheaper ($0.3325 vs $0.775 per million) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507?

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs $0.0505 per million input tokens and $0.3325 per million output tokens; Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs $0.145 and $0.775. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507?

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 comparison based on?

11 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next