Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs Mistral Large 2407

Mistral Large 2407 leads Llama 3.2 3B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 7.6 to 5.7, and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs 18.0x less per output token ($0.3325 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 10 benchmarks have a result for both.

Llama 3.2 3B InstructMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.3325
4
Mistral Large 2407Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$6.00
6
vs boards won of 10 shared

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct or Mistral Large 2407: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 3.2 3B Instruct for output tokens 18.0x cheaper ($0.3325 vs $6.00 per million) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Shared results
10
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct only
25
Mistral Large 2407 only
7
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct not benchmarked, Mistral Large 2407 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Knowledge, 33.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run): Llama 3.2 3B Instruct 34.7% against Mistral Large 2407 68.3%, 33.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct $0.3325 against Mistral Large 2407 $6.00 per million output tokens, 18.0x apart.
Context window
Both take 131K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryLlama 3.2 3B InstructBarsMistral Large 2407Ties
Coding01
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning11
Math20
Knowledge01
General11
All shared boards46
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3B InstructMistral Large 2407Leader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)8.3%26.7%Mistral Large 2407
LMArena Text: coding1098Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1103Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3B InstructMistral Large 2407Leader
AA Intelligence Index5.77.6Mistral Large 2407
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3B InstructMistral Large 2407Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom21.1%33.0%Mistral Large 2407
BALROG10.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)21.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Reasoning benchmarks for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3B InstructMistral Large 2407Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)25.5%47.2%Mistral Large 2407
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)5.3%2.9%Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured49.0%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
SimpleBenchNot measured22.5%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1095Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: expert1090Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1141Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3B InstructMistral Large 2407Leader
AA Math Index3.30.0Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)3.3%0.0%Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured8.5%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
MATH level 5Not measured44.8%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
LMArena Text: math1126Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1128Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3B InstructMistral Large 2407Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)34.7%68.3%Mistral Large 2407
MMLUNot measured80.0%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
LMArena Text: science1106Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1104Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1115Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1074Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3B InstructMistral Large 2407Leader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
General benchmarks for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3B InstructMistral Large 2407Leader
IFBench26.2%31.6%Mistral Large 2407
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)4.3%2.0%Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
DTBenchNot measured61.2%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured69.0%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
LMArena Text1110Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1089Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1094Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: English1180Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: non-English1019Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1017Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: German1056Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Russian949Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1105Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1100Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1096Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1083Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3B InstructMistral Large 2407Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct$0.0002Fits in one request
Mistral Large 2407$0.0050Fits in one request

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct$0.0035Fits in one request
Mistral Large 2407$0.118Fits in one request

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct$0.013Exceeds the context window
Mistral Large 2407$0.460Exceeds the context window

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Mistral Large 2407
SpecificationMeta Llama 3.2 3B InstructMistral Large 2407
MakerMeta LlamaMistral AI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 25, 2024November 19, 2024
Context window131K131K
Input $/Mtok$0.0505$2.00
Output $/Mtok$0.3325$6.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama 3.2 3B Instruct better than Mistral Large 2407 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 3.2 3B Instruct for output tokens 18.0x cheaper ($0.3325 vs $6.00 per million) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct or Mistral Large 2407?

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs $0.0505 per million input tokens and $0.3325 per million output tokens; Mistral Large 2407 costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct or Mistral Large 2407?

Neither: both take 131K tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs Mistral Large 2407 comparison based on?

10 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Large 2407's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next