Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Hy3

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct costs 1.6x less per output token than Hy3 ($0.201 vs $0.33 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 26 benchmarks have a result for both.

Llama 3.2 1B InstructMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
4.8
Output $/M
$0.201
0
Hy3Tencent
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.33
26
vs boards won of 26 shared

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct or Hy3: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 3.2 1B Instruct for output tokens 1.6x cheaper ($0.201 vs $0.33 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Shared results
26
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct only
11
Hy3 only
18
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct not benchmarked, Hy3 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Knowledge, 67.5 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: Chinese: Llama 3.2 1B Instruct 959 against Hy3 1485, 80.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct $0.201 against Hy3 $0.33 per million output tokens, 1.6x apart.
Context window
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct takes 60K tokens, Hy3 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryLlama 3.2 1B InstructBarsHy3Ties
Coding02
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
General013
All shared boards026
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and Hy3
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 1B InstructHy3Leader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1507Only Hy3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)1.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
SciCodeNot measured48.6%Only Hy3 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)0.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
ALE-BenchNot measured838.6Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: coding10701466Hy3
LMArena Text: software and IT10561463Hy3
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1511Only Hy3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1487Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and Hy3
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 1B InstructHy3Leader
AA Intelligence Index4.8Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and Hy3
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 1B InstructHy3Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom0.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
BALROG6.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and Hy3
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 1B InstructHy3Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)19.6%89.7%Hy3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)5.5%33.5%Hy3
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)23.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts10441447Hy3
LMArena Text: expert10071461Hy3
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English10871455Hy3
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and Hy3
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 1B InstructHy3Leader
AA Math Index0.0Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)0.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
OTIS Mock AIME0.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math10861473Hy3
LMArena Text: mathematical work10981482Hy3
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and Hy3
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 1B InstructHy3Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)20.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science10551457Hy3
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare10091452Hy3
LMArena Text: legal and government10711422Hy3
LMArena Text: business and finance10001424Hy3
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and Hy3
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 1B InstructHy3Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1230Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1207Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1208Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1163Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1233Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1227Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1200Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1152Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index013
General benchmarks for Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and Hy3
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 1B InstructHy3Leader
IFBench22.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.2 1B Instruct measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)6.7%79.0%Hy3
LMArena Text10551438Hy3
LMArena Text: instruction following10311426Hy3
LMArena Text: creative writing10331403Hy3
LMArena Text: English11171448Hy3
LMArena Text: non-English9731426Hy3
LMArena Text: Chinese9591485Hy3
LMArena Text: German10141449Hy3
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1397Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1396Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1456Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1457Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: Russian9411432Hy3
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1447Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn10301436Hy3
LMArena Text: longer queries10501442Hy3
LMArena Text: writing and language10301414Hy3
LMArena Text: entertainment and media10251400Hy3
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and Hy3
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 1B InstructHy3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct$0.0001Fits in one request
Hy3$0.0002Fits in one request

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct$0.0020Fits in one request
Hy3$0.0051Fits in one request

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct$0.0074Exceeds the context window
Hy3$0.020Fits in one request

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and Hy3
SpecificationMeta Llama 3.2 1B InstructTencent Hy3
MakerMeta LlamaTencent
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 25, 2024July 6, 2026
Context window60K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.027$0.0825
Output $/Mtok$0.201$0.33
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama 3.2 1B Instruct better than Hy3 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 3.2 1B Instruct for output tokens 1.6x cheaper ($0.201 vs $0.33 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.2 1B Instruct or Hy3?

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct costs $0.027 per million input tokens and $0.201 per million output tokens; Hy3 costs $0.0825 and $0.33. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 3.2 1B Instruct or Hy3?

Hy3, with 262K tokens against 60K.

How many benchmarks is the Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Hy3 comparison based on?

26 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Llama 3.2 1B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Hy3's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next