Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Kimi K2 0905 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Kimi K2 0905 leads Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 15.3 to 8.9, and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs 11.4x less per output token ($0.22 vs $2.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 11 benchmarks have a result for both.

Kimi K2 0905Moonshot AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.50
6
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.22
5
vs boards won of 11 shared

Kimi K2 0905 or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Kimi K2 0905 for work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
11
Kimi K2 0905 only
6
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B only
31
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Kimi K2 0905 not benchmarked, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 33.7 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AA Math Index: Kimi K2 0905 57.3 against Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B 91.0, 33.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Kimi K2 0905 $2.50 against Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B $0.22 per million output tokens, 11.4x apart.
Context window
Both take 262K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryKimi K2 0905BarsNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BTies
Coding11
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning11
Math02
Knowledge10
General11
All shared boards65
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index11
Coding benchmarks for Kimi K2 0905 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkKimi K2 0905Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
AA Coding IndexNot measured14.4Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)61.0%74.1%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
SciCodeNot measured30.6%Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)23.5%13.6%Kimi K2 0905
WeirdML36.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0905 measured
ALE-Bench267.1Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0905 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1378Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1383Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Kimi K2 0905 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkKimi K2 0905Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
AA Intelligence Index15.38.9Kimi K2 0905
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Kimi K2 0905 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkKimi K2 0905Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.0Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
τ²-Bench Telecom73.4%40.9%Kimi K2 0905
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Reasoning benchmarks for Kimi K2 0905 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkKimi K2 0905Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)76.7%75.7%Kimi K2 0905
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)6.4%11.4%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1348Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1355Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1376Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0905 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Kimi K2 0905 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkKimi K2 0905Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
AA Math Index57.391.0Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)57.3%91.0%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1371Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1375Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Knowledge benchmarks for Kimi K2 0905 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkKimi K2 0905Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)81.9%79.4%Kimi K2 0905
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1353Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1349Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1341Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1346Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Kimi K2 0905 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkKimi K2 0905Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
Design Arena: websites1088Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0905 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1098Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0905 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
General benchmarks for Kimi K2 0905 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkKimi K2 0905Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
IFBench41.7%71.1%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)53.0%38.0%Kimi K2 0905
Fiction.LiveBench66.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0905 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1348Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1303Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1269Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1377Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1320Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1383Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1348Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1268Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1269Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1396Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1376Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1304Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1303Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1319Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1300Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1283Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1293Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Kimi K2 0905 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkKimi K2 0905Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Kimi K2 0905$0.0019Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.0002Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Kimi K2 0905$0.037Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.0034Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Kimi K2 0905$0.145Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.013Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Kimi K2 0905 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
SpecificationMoonshotAI Kimi K2 0905NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
MakerMoonshot AINVIDIA
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 4, 2025December 14, 2025
Context window262K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.60$0.055
Output $/Mtok$2.50$0.22
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Kimi K2 0905 better than Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Kimi K2 0905 for work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2 0905 or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

Kimi K2 0905 costs $0.60 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs $0.055 and $0.22. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Kimi K2 0905 or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

Neither: both take 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Kimi K2 0905 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B comparison based on?

11 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Kimi K2 0905's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next