Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Schematron V2 Small vs Relace Apply 3

Schematron V2 Small costs 5.4x less per output token than Relace Apply 3 ($0.23 vs $1.25 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Schematron V2 SmallInference.net
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.23
Relace Apply 3Relace
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.25
vs $0.23 vs $1.25 per 1M output tokens. Schematron V2 Small is 5.4x cheaper.

Schematron V2 Small or Relace Apply 3: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Schematron V2 Small for output tokens 5.4x cheaper ($0.23 vs $1.25 per million).

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Schematron V2 Small not benchmarked, Relace Apply 3 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Schematron V2 Small $0.23 against Relace Apply 3 $1.25 per million output tokens, 5.4x apart.
Context window
Schematron V2 Small takes 128K tokens, Relace Apply 3 256K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Schematron V2 Small$0.0002Fits in one request
Relace Apply 3$0.0015Fits in one request

Schematron V2 Small costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Schematron V2 Small$0.0032Fits in one request
Relace Apply 3$0.046Fits in one request

Schematron V2 Small costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Schematron V2 Small$0.012Exceeds the context window
Relace Apply 3$0.182Fits in one request

Schematron V2 Small costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Schematron V2 Small and Relace Apply 3
SpecificationInference.net Schematron V2 SmallRelace Apply 3
MakerInference.netRelace
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 12, 2026September 26, 2025
Context window128K256K
Input $/Mtok$0.05$0.85
Output $/Mtok$0.23$1.25
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Schematron V2 Small better than Relace Apply 3 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Schematron V2 Small for output tokens 5.4x cheaper ($0.23 vs $1.25 per million).

Which is cheaper, Schematron V2 Small or Relace Apply 3?

Schematron V2 Small costs $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.23 per million output tokens; Relace Apply 3 costs $0.85 and $1.25. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Schematron V2 Small or Relace Apply 3?

Relace Apply 3, with 256K tokens against 128K.

Has any benchmark tested both Schematron V2 Small and Relace Apply 3?

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next