Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Schematron V2 Small vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Schematron V2 Small costs 4.3x less per output token than Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct ($0.23 vs $1.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Replace Schematron V2 Small Replace Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Schematron V2 SmallInference.net
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.23
Qwen2.5 VL 72B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.00
vs $0.23 vs $1.00 per 1M output tokens. Schematron V2 Small is 4.3x cheaper.

Schematron V2 Small or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Schematron V2 Small for output tokens 4.3x cheaper ($0.23 vs $1.00 per million).

Model ASchematron V2 SmallInference.netNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BQwen2.5 VL 72B InstructQwenNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task

No benchmark has tested both yet. Schematron V2 Small has none yet; Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct on OSWorld, Kagi LLM Benchmark and GeoBench. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Schematron V2 Small not benchmarked, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Schematron V2 Small $0.23 against Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct $1.00 per million output tokens, 4.3x apart.
Context window
Both take 128K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Schematron V2 Small and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
BenchmarkSchematron V2 SmallQwen2.5 VL 72B InstructLeader
OSWorldNot measured5.0%Only Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Schematron V2 Small and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
BenchmarkSchematron V2 SmallQwen2.5 VL 72B InstructLeader
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured36.0%Only Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Schematron V2 Small and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
BenchmarkSchematron V2 SmallQwen2.5 VL 72B InstructLeader
GeoBenchNot measured62.0%Only Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
General benchmarks for Schematron V2 Small and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
BenchmarkSchematron V2 SmallQwen2.5 VL 72B InstructLeader
LMArena VisionNot measured1107Only Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1115Only Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1107Only Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 45 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Schematron V2 Small$0.0002Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct$0.0013Fits in one request

Schematron V2 Small costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Schematron V2 Small$0.0032Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct$0.043Fits in one request

Schematron V2 Small costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Schematron V2 Small$0.012Exceeds the context window
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct$0.170Exceeds the context window

Schematron V2 Small costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Schematron V2 Small and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
SpecificationInference.net Schematron V2 SmallQwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
MakerInference.netQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 12, 2026February 1, 2025
Context window128K128K
Input $/Mtok$0.05$0.80
Output $/Mtok$0.23$1.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Schematron V2 Small better than Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Schematron V2 Small for output tokens 4.3x cheaper ($0.23 vs $1.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Schematron V2 Small or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

Schematron V2 Small costs $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.23 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct costs $0.80 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Schematron V2 Small or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

Neither: both take 128K tokens.

Has any benchmark tested both Schematron V2 Small and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Schematron V2 Small has none yet; Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct on OSWorld, Kagi LLM Benchmark and GeoBench. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next