Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Schematron V2 Small vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Schematron V2 Small costs 2.2x less per output token than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ($0.23 vs $0.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Schematron V2 SmallInference.net
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.23
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
35.6
Output $/M
$0.50
vs $0.23 vs $0.50 per 1M output tokens. Schematron V2 Small is 2.2x cheaper.

Schematron V2 Small or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Schematron V2 Small for output tokens 2.2x cheaper ($0.23 vs $0.50 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Schematron V2 Small has none yet; Nemotron 3.5 Super VL on LiveBench coding, SciCode and AA Intelligence Index. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Schematron V2 Small not benchmarked, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Schematron V2 Small $0.23 against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL $0.50 per million output tokens, 2.2x apart.
Context window
Schematron V2 Small takes 128K tokens, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index2 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Schematron V2 Small and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkSchematron V2 SmallNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured65.5%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
SciCodeNot measured47.8%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Schematron V2 Small and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkSchematron V2 SmallNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured26.5Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Schematron V2 Small and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkSchematron V2 SmallNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench researchNot measured70.9%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench browserNot measured4.0%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured15.8%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Schematron V2 Small and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkSchematron V2 SmallNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured78.8%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured30.7%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Schematron V2 Small and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkSchematron V2 SmallNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1173Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1149Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1110Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1128Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1154Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench designNot measured60.7%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
General benchmarks for Schematron V2 Small and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkSchematron V2 SmallNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured64.6%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured69.0%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Neither model has a result on the other 46 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Schematron V2 Small$0.0002Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0004Fits in one request

Schematron V2 Small costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Schematron V2 Small$0.0032Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0090Fits in one request

Schematron V2 Small costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Schematron V2 Small$0.012Exceeds the context window
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.035Fits in one request

Schematron V2 Small costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Schematron V2 Small and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
SpecificationInference.net Schematron V2 SmallNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
MakerInference.netNVIDIA
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 12, 2026October 15, 2026
Context window128K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.05$0.15
Output $/Mtok$0.23$0.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Schematron V2 Small better than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Schematron V2 Small for output tokens 2.2x cheaper ($0.23 vs $0.50 per million).

Which is cheaper, Schematron V2 Small or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Schematron V2 Small costs $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.23 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs $0.15 and $0.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Schematron V2 Small or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

Has any benchmark tested both Schematron V2 Small and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Schematron V2 Small has none yet; Nemotron 3.5 Super VL on LiveBench coding, SciCode and AA Intelligence Index. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next