Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Schematron V2 Small vs Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Schematron V2 Small costs 4.3x less per output token than Hermes 3 405B Instruct ($0.23 vs $1.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Schematron V2 SmallInference.net
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.23
N Hermes 3 405B InstructNous Research
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.00
vs $0.23 vs $1.00 per 1M output tokens. Schematron V2 Small is 4.3x cheaper.

Schematron V2 Small or Hermes 3 405B Instruct: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Schematron V2 Small for output tokens 4.3x cheaper ($0.23 vs $1.00 per million).

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Schematron V2 Small not benchmarked, Hermes 3 405B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Schematron V2 Small $0.23 against Hermes 3 405B Instruct $1.00 per million output tokens, 4.3x apart.
Context window
Schematron V2 Small takes 128K tokens, Hermes 3 405B Instruct 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Schematron V2 Small$0.0002Fits in one request
Hermes 3 405B Instruct$0.0015Fits in one request

Schematron V2 Small costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Schematron V2 Small$0.0032Fits in one request
Hermes 3 405B Instruct$0.053Fits in one request

Schematron V2 Small costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Schematron V2 Small$0.012Exceeds the context window
Hermes 3 405B Instruct$0.210Exceeds the context window

Schematron V2 Small costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Schematron V2 Small and Hermes 3 405B Instruct
SpecificationInference.net Schematron V2 SmallNous Hermes 3 405B Instruct
MakerInference.netNous Research
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 12, 2026August 16, 2024
Context window128K131K
Input $/Mtok$0.05$1.00
Output $/Mtok$0.23$1.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Schematron V2 Small better than Hermes 3 405B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Schematron V2 Small for output tokens 4.3x cheaper ($0.23 vs $1.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Schematron V2 Small or Hermes 3 405B Instruct?

Schematron V2 Small costs $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.23 per million output tokens; Hermes 3 405B Instruct costs $1.00 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Schematron V2 Small or Hermes 3 405B Instruct?

Hermes 3 405B Instruct, with 131K tokens against 128K.

Has any benchmark tested both Schematron V2 Small and Hermes 3 405B Instruct?

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next