Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507

Ling 3.0 Flash VL leads Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 24.6 to 7.5, and Ling 3.0 Flash VL costs 1.7x less per output token ($0.18 vs $0.30 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 5 benchmarks have a result for both.

Ling 3.0 Flash VLinclusionAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.18
5
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
41.5
Output $/M
$0.30
0
vs boards won of 5 shared

Ling 3.0 Flash VL or Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Ling 3.0 Flash VL for output tokens 1.7x cheaper ($0.18 vs $0.30 per million).

Shared results
5
Ling 3.0 Flash VL only
2
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 only
40
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Ling 3.0 Flash VL not benchmarked, Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 17.1 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: Ling 3.0 Flash VL 24.6 against Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 7.5, 17.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Ling 3.0 Flash VL $0.18 against Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 $0.30 per million output tokens, 1.7x apart.
Context window
Ling 3.0 Flash VL takes 131K tokens, Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryLing 3.0 Flash VLBarsQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Ties
Coding10
Intelligence10
Reasoning20
General10
All shared boards50
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for Ling 3.0 Flash VL and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLing 3.0 Flash VLQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
AA Coding Index57.0Not measuredOnly Ling 3.0 Flash VL measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured70.7%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
SciCode44.2%33.0%Ling 3.0 Flash VL
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured6.1%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1416Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1417Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Ling 3.0 Flash VL and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLing 3.0 Flash VLQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
AA Intelligence Index24.67.5Ling 3.0 Flash VL
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Ling 3.0 Flash VL and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLing 3.0 Flash VLQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
AA Agentic Index28.7Not measuredOnly Ling 3.0 Flash VL measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured28.1%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured41.4%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for Ling 3.0 Flash VL and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLing 3.0 Flash VLQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)86.2%70.7%Ling 3.0 Flash VL
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)22.0%10.3%Ling 3.0 Flash VL
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured55.6%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1398Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1396Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1406Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Ling 3.0 Flash VL and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLing 3.0 Flash VLQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
AA Math IndexNot measured66.3Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured66.3%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured62.2%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1395Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1412Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Ling 3.0 Flash VL and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLing 3.0 Flash VLQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured80.5%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1393Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1392Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1387Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1389Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Ling 3.0 Flash VL and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLing 3.0 Flash VLQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for Ling 3.0 Flash VL and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLing 3.0 Flash VLQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
IFBenchNot measured50.7%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)78.3%61.3%Ling 3.0 Flash VL
DTBenchNot measured67.2%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMCANot measured22.4%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1384Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1363Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1317Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1391Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1372Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1433Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1379Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1338Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1331Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1419Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1404Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1369Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1353Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1378Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1378Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1336Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1334Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Ling 3.0 Flash VL and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLing 3.0 Flash VLQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash VL$0.0001Fits in one request
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507$0.0002Fits in one request

Ling 3.0 Flash VL costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash VL$0.0035Fits in one request
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507$0.0054Fits in one request

Ling 3.0 Flash VL costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash VL$0.014Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507$0.021Fits in one request

Ling 3.0 Flash VL costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Ling 3.0 Flash VL and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
SpecificationinclusionAI Ling 3.0 Flash VLQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
MakerinclusionAIQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 10, 2026July 29, 2025
Context window131K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.06$0.09
Output $/Mtok$0.18$0.30
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Ling 3.0 Flash VL better than Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Ling 3.0 Flash VL for output tokens 1.7x cheaper ($0.18 vs $0.30 per million).

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL costs $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.18 per million output tokens; Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs $0.09 and $0.30. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507?

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 comparison based on?

5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. Ling 3.0 Flash VL's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next