Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Mercury 3 vs Summarize

Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Mercury 3Inception
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.35
S SummarizeScaledown
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
No data
vs 1M vs 1M context window. About the same size.

Mercury 3 or Summarize: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. Mercury 3 has results on Design Arena: websites, Design Arena: UI components and Design Arena: game dev; Summarize has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Mercury 3 not benchmarked, Summarize not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Mercury 3 $0.35 against Summarize Free per million output tokens.
Context window
Both take 1M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Mercury 3 and Summarize
BenchmarkMercury 3SummarizeLeader
Design Arena: websites1244Not measuredOnly Mercury 3 measured
Design Arena: UI components1270Not measuredOnly Mercury 3 measured
Design Arena: game dev1227Not measuredOnly Mercury 3 measured
Design Arena: data viz1207Not measuredOnly Mercury 3 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1240Not measuredOnly Mercury 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Mercury 3$0.0003Fits in one request
Summarize$0.0000Fits in one request

Summarize costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Mercury 3$0.0060Fits in one request
Summarize$0.0020Fits in one request

Summarize costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Mercury 3$0.024Fits in one request
Summarize$0.0080Fits in one request

Summarize costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Mercury 3 and Summarize
SpecificationInception Mercury 3ScaleDown Summarize
MakerInceptionScaledown
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 16, 2026October 13, 2026
Context window1M1M
Input $/Mtok$0.10$0.04
Output $/Mtok$0.35Free
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Mercury 3 better than Summarize for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Mercury 3 or Summarize?

Mercury 3 costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.35 per million output tokens; Summarize costs $0.04 and Free. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Mercury 3 or Summarize?

Neither: both take 1M tokens.

Has any benchmark tested both Mercury 3 and Summarize?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Mercury 3 has results on Design Arena: websites, Design Arena: UI components and Design Arena: game dev; Summarize has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next